Gaseous iron(II) and iron(III) complexes with BINOLate ligands

被引:11
|
作者
Rochut, Sophie [2 ]
Roithova, Jana [3 ]
Schroeder, Detlef [1 ]
Novara, Francesca R. [4 ]
Schwarz, Helmut [4 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Inst Organ Chem & Biochem, Prague 16610 6, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Paris 06, LADIR, Paris, France
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Chim, Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jasms.2007.10.021
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Electrospray ionization (ESI) of dilute solutions of 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol (BINOL) and iron(II) or iron(III) sulfate in methanol/water allows the generation of monocationic complexes of iron and deprotonated BINOL ligands with additional methanol molecules in the coordination sphere, and the types of complexes formed can be controlled by the valence of the iron precursors used in ESI. Thus, iron(II) sulfate leads to [(BINOLate)Fe(CH3OH)(n)](+) complexes (n = 0-3), whereas usage of iron(III) sulfate allows the generation of [(BINOLdiate)-Fe(CH3OH)(n)](+) cations (n = 0-2); here, BINOLate and BINOLdiate stand for singly and doubly deprotonated BINOL, respectively. Upon collision-induced dissociation, the mass-selected ions with n > 0 first lose the methanol ligands and then undergo characteristic fragmentations. Bare [(BINOLdiate)Fe](+), a formal iron(III) species, undergoes decarbonylation, which is known as a typical fragmentation of ionized phenols and phenolates either as free species or as the corresponding metal complexes. The bare [(BINOLate)Fe](+) cation, on the other hand, preferentially loses neutral FeOH to afford an organic C20HI2O+center dot cation radical, which most likely corresponds to ionized 1,1'-dinaphthofurane.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrochemical and spectrophotometric studies of macrocyclic complexes of iron (III) and iron (II)
    Singh, R
    Kumar, P
    Singh, K
    Kumar, J
    BULLETIN OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2002, 18 (12): : 543 - 550
  • [42] POLAROGRAPHIC-DETERMINATION OF IRON(II) AND IRON(III) COMPLEXES WITH EDTA
    VISALAKSHI, G
    NARASIMHAN, SV
    VENKATESWARLU, KS
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1988, 212 (1-2) : 335 - 339
  • [43] PREPARATION OF IRON(II) FLUORIDE BY THERMOLYSIS OF IRON(III) FLUOROAMMONIUM COMPLEXES
    KUZNETSOVA, NI
    IKRAMI, DD
    OKHUNOV, R
    SIDOROV, VS
    SEMENOV, EV
    ZHURNAL NEORGANICHESKOI KHIMII, 1991, 36 (03): : 603 - 608
  • [45] IRON(III) AND COPPER(II) MALATE COMPLEXES
    SALNIKOV, YI
    USTYAK, VV
    ZHURNAL NEORGANICHESKOI KHIMII, 1983, 28 (01): : 148 - 150
  • [46] PHOTOCHEMISTRY OF IRON (II), (III), AND (IV) COMPLEXES
    ZINK, JI
    SCHWENDIMAN, D
    INCORVIA, MJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1975, (169): : 142 - 142
  • [47] AMIDINO-COMPLEXES OF IRON(II) AND (III)
    CLARK, JA
    KILNER, M
    PIETRZYKOWSKI, A
    INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA-ARTICLES AND LETTERS, 1984, 82 (01): : 85 - 92
  • [48] Binding of π-acceptor ligands to (triamine)iron(II) complexes
    Moreland, AC
    Rauchfuss, TB
    INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2000, 39 (14) : 3029 - 3036
  • [49] Bis(pyrazol-1-yl)acetates as tripodal heteroscorpionate Ligands in iron chemistry:: Syntheses and structures of Iron(II) and Iron(III) complexes with bpza, bdmpza, and bdtbpza ligands
    Beck, A
    Barth, A
    Hubner, E
    Burzlaff, N
    INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2003, 42 (22) : 7182 - 7188
  • [50] CHEMISTRY OF IRON WITH DIPICOLINIC ACID .1. MONONUCLEAR COMPLEXES OF IRON(II) OR IRON(III)
    LAINE, P
    GOURDON, A
    LAUNAY, JP
    INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1995, 34 (21) : 5129 - 5137