Anti-endomysial antibody negative celiac disease - Does additional serological testing help?

被引:30
|
作者
Dahele, A
Kingstone, K
Bode, J
Anderson, D
Ghosh, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Gastrointestinal Unit, Dept Med Microbiol, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Med Sci, Gastrointestinal Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
anti-gliadin antibodies; anti-endomysium antibodies; anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies; celiac disease;
D O I
10.1023/A:1005589202529
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Anti-endomysium antibodies (AEM) fail to identify all untreated celiac disease (CD) patients. This study aims to determine if additional serology, in particular, IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies, increases detection. Fifty-three biopsy-proven untreated CD patients (39 women, 14 men; median age 51 years) and 65 control patients with normal duodenal histology (46 women, 19 men; age range 17-90 years, median 45 years) were prospectively studied. Serum total IgA, IgA anti-tTG, IgA AEM, IgA anti-gliadin (AGA) and IgG AGA antibodies were measured. Thirteen (25%) CD patients were AEM negative. None were IgA deficient. Three AEM-negative CD patients had a raised IgA anti-tTG and IgA AGA. IgG AGA was raised in 10 AEM-negative CD patients, but also in 14/65 (22%) of controls. In conclusion, AEM-negative CD is common and detection is only modestly enhanced by testing for IgA anti-tTG antibodies. Duodenal biopsy is still recommended for the accurate diagnosis of CD.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 221
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] POSITIVE ANTI-GLIADIN ANTIBODIES WITH NEGATIVE ANTI-ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODIES: PREVALENCE OF COELIAC DISEASE AND OTHER GASTROINTESTINAL PATHOLOGY
    Taylor, K. M.
    Patel, K.
    Stratton, C.
    Wicking, J.
    McNair, A.
    GUT, 2010, 59 : A162 - A163
  • [32] IgA deficiency causes false-negative endomysial antibody results in celiac disease
    Rittmeyer, C
    Rhoads, JM
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1996, 23 (04): : 504 - 506
  • [33] Serological screening for celiac disease, by endomysial antibodies, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Ghozzi, Mariam
    Mechi, Fatma
    Ben Salem, Alma
    El Ahmer, Ikram
    Mbarki, Donia Rachel
    Melayah, Sarra
    Mankai, Amani
    Ghedira, Ibtissem
    ANNALES DE BIOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2023, 81 (06) : 569 - 575
  • [34] IGA ANTI-ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODIES ON HUMAN UMBILICAL-CORD TISSUE FOR CELIAC-DISEASE SCREENING - SAVE BOTH MONEY AND MONKEYS
    VOLTA, U
    MOLINARO, N
    DEFRANCESCHI, L
    FRATANGELO, D
    BIANCHI, FB
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1995, 40 (09) : 1902 - 1905
  • [35] The Diagnostic Value of Serum IGG-Antigliadin, IGA Anti-Endomysial and IGA Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies for Pediatric Celiac Disease
    A Abdollahi
    M Mehrazma
    E Talachian
    Pediatric Research, 2011, 70 : 775 - 775
  • [36] THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF SERUM IGG-ANTIGLIADIN, IGA ANTI-ENDOMYSIAL AND IGA ANTI-TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODIES FOR PEDIATRIC CELIAC DISEASE
    Abdollahi, A.
    Mehrazma, M.
    Talachian, E.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2011, 70 : 775 - 775
  • [37] Celiac disease in an adult population with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Use of endomysial antibody testing
    Talal, AH
    Murray, JA
    Goeken, JA
    Sivitz, WI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 92 (08): : 1280 - 1284
  • [38] Screening for gluten enteropathy: A comparison of the use of a multiple antibody panel versus anti-endomysial antibody alone.
    Olson, A
    Turke, P
    LouisJacques, O
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (04) : A33 - A33
  • [39] The relationship between anti-endomysial & anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody levels and the mucosal lesion in patients with suspected Coeliac disease.
    Murphy, JGP
    Annis, P
    Burke, L
    Hogan, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2001, 81 (01) : 92A - 92A
  • [40] SEROLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE SPECIFICITY AND SENSITIVITY OF ENDOMYSIAL AND RETICULIN ANTIBODIES IN CELIAC-DISEASE
    KUMAR, V
    LERNER, A
    CHORZELSKI, TP
    BEUTNER, EH
    LEBENTHAL, E
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 92 (05) : 1484 - 1484