We propose a general framework for reasoning and deciding in uncertain scenarios, with possibly infinite source of information (open world). This involves representing ignorance, uncertainty and contradiction; we present and analyze those concepts, integrating them in the notion of lack of confidence or perplexity. We introduce and quantify the strength of the beliefs of an agent and investigate how he can do explicit epistemic actions in order to supply information lacks. Next we introduce a simple distributed game (RBG) and we use it as a testbed for comparing the performance of agents using the (classical) "expected utility maximization" and the "perplexity minimization" strategies.
机构:
Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USAUniv Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Rubin, Rachael D.
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USAUniv Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
Duff, Melissa C.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Iowa, Dept Neurol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
Univ Iowa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Iowa City, IA 52242 USAUniv Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Duff, Melissa C.
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Tranel, Daniel
Cohen, Neal J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Urbana, IL 61801 USAUniv Illinois, Beckman Inst, Urbana, IL 61801 USA