Intracranial glioblastoma models in preclinical neuro-oncology: neuropathological characterization and tumor progression

被引:262
|
作者
Candolfi, Marianela
Curtin, James F.
Nichols, W. Stephen
Muhammad, A. K. M. G.
King, Gwendalyn D.
Pluhar, G. Elizabeth
McNiel, Elizabeth A.
Ohlfest, John R.
Freese, Andrew B.
Moore, Peter F.
Lerner, Jonathan
Lowenstein, Pedro R.
Castro, Maria G.
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Board Governors Gen Therepeut Res Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Vet Clin Sci, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosurg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Vet Pathol & Microbiol & Immunol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
glioma; dog; U251; U87; CNS-1; GL26;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-007-9400-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although rodent glioblastoma (GBM) models have been used for over 30 years, the extent to which they recapitulate the characteristics encountered in human GBMs remains controversial. We studied the histopathological features of dog GBM and human xenograft GBM models in immune-deficient mice (U251 and U87 GBM in nude Balb/c), and syngeneic GBMs in immune-competent rodents (GL26 cells in C57BL/6 mice, CNS-1 cells in Lewis rats). All GBMs studied exhibited neovascularization, pleomorphism, vimentin immunoreactivity, and infiltration of T-cells and macrophages. All the tumors showed necrosis and hemorrhages, except the U87 human xenograft, in which the most salient feature was its profuse neovascularization. The tumors differed in the expression of astrocytic intermediate filaments: human and dog GBMs, as well as U251 xenografts expressed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin, while the U87 xenograft and the syngeneic rodent GBMs were GFAP(-) and vimentin(+). Also, only dog GBMs exhibited endothelial proliferation, a key feature that was absent in the murine models. In all spontaneous and implanted GBMs we found histopathological features compatible with tumor invasion into the non-neoplastic brain parenchyma. Our data indicate that murine models of GBM appear to recapitulate several of the human GBM histopathological features and, considering their reproducibility and availability, they constitute a valuable in vivo system for preclinical studies. Importantly, our results indicate that dog GBM emerges as an attractive animal model for testing novel therapies in a spontaneous tumor in the context of a larger brain.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 148
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The landscape of brain tumor mimics in neuro-oncology practice
    Lalanthica V. Yogendran
    Tuba Kalelioglu
    Joseph H. Donahue
    Haroon Ahmad
    Kester A. Phillips
    Nicole M. Calautti
    Maria-Beatriz Lopes
    Ashok R. Asthagiri
    Benjamin Purow
    David Schiff
    Sohil H. Patel
    Camilo E. Fadul
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2022, 159 : 499 - 508
  • [22] Quantifying the Utility of a Multidisciplinary Neuro-oncology Tumor Board
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Jimenez, Adrian
    Romo, Carlos
    Kamson, David
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Weingart, Jon
    Brem, Henry
    Grossman, Stuart
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 298 - 298
  • [23] The landscape of brain tumor mimics in neuro-oncology practice
    Yogendran, Lalanthica, V
    Kalelioglu, Tuba
    Donahue, Joseph H.
    Ahmad, Haroon
    Phillips, Kester A.
    Calautti, Nicole M.
    Lopes, Maria-Beatriz
    Asthagiri, Ashok R.
    Purow, Benjamin
    Schiff, David
    Patel, Sohil H.
    Fadul, Camilo E.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 159 (03) : 499 - 508
  • [24] Quantifying the utility of a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology tumor board
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Jimenez, Adrian E.
    Romo, Carlos G.
    Kamson, David Olayinka
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Weingart, Jon
    Brem, Henry
    Grossman, Stuart A.
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [25] QUANTIFYING THE UTILITY OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY NEURO-ONCOLOGY TUMOR BOARD
    Khalafallah, Adham
    Jimenez, Adrian
    Romo, Carlos
    Kamson, David
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    Weingart, Jon
    Brem, Henry
    Grossman, Stuart
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 : 144 - 144
  • [26] Genetic counseling and tumor predisposition in neuro-oncology practice
    Dunbar, Erin M.
    Eppolito, Amanda
    Henson, John W.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 3 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [27] THE LANDSCAPE OF BRAIN TUMOR MIMICS IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE
    Yogendran, Lalanthica
    Kalelioglu, Tuba
    Donahue, Joseph
    Ahmed, Haroon
    Phillips, Kester
    Calautti, Nicole
    Lopes, Maria-Beatriz
    Asthagiri, Ashok
    Purow, Benjamin
    Schiff, David
    Patel, Sohil
    Fadul, Camilo
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 190 - 190
  • [28] NEURO-ONCOLOGY Compound kills chemotherapy-resistant glioblastoma cells
    Lempriere, Sarah
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2019, 15 (11) : 620 - 621
  • [29] Targeting glioblastoma stem-cells: a recurrent challenge in neuro-oncology
    Berzero, Giulia
    Picca, Alberto
    Sanson, Marc
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 6 : S197 - S199
  • [30] New preclinical models for neuro-oncology: Integrating data from PD3D models and orthotopic xenografts
    Orthmann, A.
    Krassnig, S.
    Joedicke, A.
    Linnebacher, M.
    Silvestri, A.
    Regenbrecht, C.
    Fichtner, I.
    Hoffmann, J.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 41 : 179 - 179