The effect of lercanidipine or lercanidipine/enalapril combination on blood pressure in treatment-naive patients with stage 1 or 2 systolic hypertension

被引:0
|
作者
Rayner, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hosp, Kidney & Hypertens Res Unit, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
来源
关键词
European hypertension guidelines; primary therapy for treatment-naive patients; stage; 1; hypertension; 2; efficacy; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS; VARIABILITY; AMLODIPINE; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.2147/POR.S186070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the efficacy of a stratified approach on automatic office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and BP variability (BPV) in treatment-naive patients with systolic hypertension using lercanidipine for stage 1 and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 2. Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective interventional study conducted in 22 general practices in South Africa. Treatment-naive patients with stage 1 hypertension received lercanidipine 10 mg and patients with stage 2 received lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg. After 6 weeks, patients not reaching target (<140/90 mmHg) were up-titrated to lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 10 mg or lercanidipine 10 mg/enalapril 20 mg, respectively, for a further 6 weeks. Office BP was determined at each visit, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM) at baseline and 12 weeks. The primary end point was changes in office BP, and secondary end points were changes in 24-hour ABPM and BPV. Results: Of the 198 patients, 48% had stage 1 and 52% stage 2 hypertension. The mean age was 55 years, body mass index was 29.2 kg/m(2), 48.5% were female, and 15.1% were diabetic. The mean (SD) office SBP and DBP at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks was 158.2 (13.8), 141.6 (11.1), and 138.7 (16.7) mmHg (P<0.00001), and 92.2 (10.6), 84.6 (11.1), and 82 (13.3) mmHg (P<0.00001), respectively. The mean (SD) systolic and diastolic daytime ABPM at baseline and 12 weeks was 157 (16.63) and 142 (14.41) mmHg (P<0.0001) and 88 (12.34) and 81 (10.79) mmHg (P<0.0001), and the nighttime ABPM was 146 (15.68) and 133 (13.94) mmHg (P<0.0001) and 79.5 (11.64) and 72.5 (10.05) mmHg (P<0.009), respectively. There were few adverse events. Conclusion: Lercanidipine and lercanidipine/enalapril for stage 1 or 2 hypertension highly improves office SBP and DBP, overall 24-hour BP, daytime BP, and nighttime BP, also reducing BPV with few adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blood Pressure and Metabolic Effect of a Combination of Lercanidipine with Different Antihypertensive Drugs in Clinical Practice
    Cicero, Arrigo F. G.
    Gerocarni, Beatrice
    Rosticci, Martina
    Borghi, Claudio
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2012, 34 (02) : 113 - 117
  • [22] Lercanidipine, enalapril and their combination in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study with four ABPM
    J G Puig
    C Calvo
    O Luurila
    H Luurila
    S Sulosaari
    A Strandberg
    C Ghezzi
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2007, 21 : 917 - 924
  • [23] Lercanidipine, enalapril and their combination in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study with four ABPM
    Puig, J. G.
    Calvo, C.
    Luurila, O.
    Luurila, H.
    Sulosaari, S.
    Strandberg, A.
    Ghezzi, C.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2007, 21 (12) : 917 - 924
  • [24] Differential effects of lercanidipine on early morning blood pressure and 24-h pulse pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension related to dipping status
    Raev, D.
    Yanev, T.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S469 - S470
  • [25] Blood pressure management in treatment-naive hypertensive patients
    Jung, Ji Yong
    KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 41 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [26] ENALAPRIL/LERCANIDIPINE 20/20 MG COMPARED TO ENALAPRIL/HYDROCHLOROTIAZIDE 20/12.5 MG ON BLOOD PRESSURE VALUES AND METABOLIC PARAMETERS IN HYPERTENSIVE DIABETIC PATIENTS
    Derosa, G.
    Romano, D.
    D'Angelo, A.
    Maffioli, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E281 - E281
  • [27] Differential effects of enalapril-felodipine versus enalapril-lercanidipine combination drug treatment on sympathetic nerve traffic and metabolic profile in obesity-related hypertension
    Seravalle, Gino
    Brambilla, Gianmaria
    Pizzalla, Daniela Prata
    Casati, Anna
    Riva, Marta
    Cuspidi, Cesare
    Bombelli, Michele
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Grassi, Guido
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 10 (03) : 244 - 251
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of lercanidipine and enalapril in daily practice. A comparison of office, self-measured and ambulatory blood pressure
    Scholze, Juergen
    Bramlage, Peter
    Trenkwalder, Peter
    Kreutz, Reinhold
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 12 (18) : 2771 - 2779
  • [29] Effect of antihypertensive treatment with lercanidipine on endothelial progenitor cells and inflammation in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension
    De Ciuceis, Carolina
    Rossini, Claudia
    Tincani, Angela
    Airo, Paolo
    Scarsi, Mirco
    Agabiti-Rosei, Claudia
    Ruggeri, Giuseppina
    Caimi, Luigi
    Ricotta, Doris
    Agabiti-Rosei, Enrico
    Rizzoni, Damiano
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2016, 25 (06) : 337 - 343
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of the treatment: combination of benazepril/lercanidipine vs. benazepril alone in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Chen Ting
    Chen Guang-hui
    Yang Ting-shu
    Zhong Zhen-yu
    An Wei-shuai
    Zhang Xiao-xia
    Li Jia-dan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (12) : 2286 - 2290