Desensitization and crossmatch conversion in deceased donor kidney transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Bartel, G. [1 ]
Boehmig, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 3, Div Nephrol & Dialysis, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Antibodies; Blood component removal; Rejection; Transplantation; HIGHLY SENSITIZED PATIENTS; INTRAVENOUS IMMUNE GLOBULIN; ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNOADSORPTION THERAPY; PROTEASOME INHIBITION; ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS; HYPERACUTE REJECTION; CLINICAL-RELEVANCE; INDUCTION THERAPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Recipient allosensitization represents a major barrier to transplantation. Sensitized patients awaiting a deceased donor kidney transplant often face unacceptably long waiting times and are more prone to rejection, even in the absence of a positive crossmatch (XM). Two major strategies have been shown to facilitate the access to transplantation: specific allocation programs designed to enhance the availability of a well-matched allograft; and recipient desensitization to decrease levels of humoral alloreactivity. Over the last two to three decades, a variety of desensitization strategies have been published. Such protocols are based on the use of apheresis for direct alloantibody removal from the circulation, or high dose intravenous immunoglobulin and/or CD20 antibody rituximab for modulation of B cell immunity. An attractive approach may be the application of apheresis for rapid desensitization, with or without XM conversion, immediately before transplantation, a particular challenge because of the short interval between the transplant offer and surgery. It was shown that with currently available treatment strategies many high risk patients can be successfully transplanted within an acceptable time period. However, there is still a need for further improvement, as rejection and graft loss rates may be considerably higher than those documented for non-sensitized patients. Future studies will have to establish more precise diagnostic criteria to optimize treatment allocation and monitoring. Moreover, systematic trials are needed to assess the efficiency of innovative treatment concepts, such as the use of agents that directly affect alloantibody-producing plasma cells.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 34
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Desensitization With Imlifidase for HLA-Incompatible Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi International Expert Consensus
    Furian, Lucrezia
    Heemann, Uwe
    Bengtsson, Mats
    Bestard, Oriol
    Binet, Isabelle
    Boehmig, Georg A.
    Boletis, John
    Briggs, David
    Claas, Frans H. J.
    Couzi, Lionel
    Cozzi, Emanuele
    Crespo, Marta
    De Vries, Aiko P. J.
    Diekmann, Fritz
    Durlik, Magdalena
    Glotz, Denis
    Helantera, Ilkka
    Jackson, Annette
    Jordan, Stanley C.
    Kuypers, Dirk
    Lefaucheur, Carmen
    Legendre, Christophe
    Lorant, Tomas
    Maggiore, Umberto
    Mamode, Nizam
    Marinaki, Smaragdi
    Massart, Annick
    Mueller, Thomas
    Oberbauer, Rainer
    Renders, Lutz
    Roelen, Dave
    Taupin, Jean-Luc
    Viklicky, Ondrej
    Vittoraki, Angeliki
    de Weerd, Annelies E.
    Naesens, Maarten
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 37
  • [32] Deceased donor characteristics and kidney transplantation - Reply
    Merion, RM
    Ashby, VB
    Port, FK
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (18): : 2140 - 2140
  • [33] Alemtuzumab Induction in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation
    Shin, M.
    Song, S. H.
    Kim, J. M.
    Kwon, C. H.
    Joh, J. W.
    Lee, S. -K.
    Kim, S. -J.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (06) : 2365 - 2378
  • [34] Desensitization of highly sensitized positive donor-spesific crossmatch in CRF patients waiting for second kidney transplantation
    Nassar, Wael
    Lotfy, Esam
    El-Zanati, Mohmmad
    El-Khashab, Omar
    El-Ansary, Mervat
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 21 : 264 - 264
  • [35] The Implications of Donor Proteinuria in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.
    Vinson, A.
    Keough-Ryan, T.
    West, K.
    Tennankore, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 803 - 803
  • [36] Mitigating risk of deceased donor renal transplantation after positive crossmatch.
    Goldstein, Michael J.
    Sorenson, Eric
    Abreu-Goris, Maria
    Dadhania, Darshana
    Kapur, Sandip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 344 - 344
  • [37] Deceased Donor Transplantation Across Positive Flow Crossmatch - A Single Center Experience
    Campara, M.
    Lichvar, A.
    Benken, J.
    Patel, S.
    Muran, C.
    Pierce, D.
    Tang, I.
    Di Cocco, P.
    Alvarez, J. Almario
    Spaggiari, M.
    Benedetti, E.
    Tzvetanov, I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 682 - 683
  • [38] SUCCESSFUL DESENSITIZATION IN LIVE DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Blakely, Kelly
    Steiner, Robert
    Khanna, Ajar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2013, 61 (04) : A28 - A28
  • [39] Ultrasound Assessing Donor Kidney Quality in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.
    Yun, S.
    Lee, K.
    Park, S.
    Park, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 661 - 661
  • [40] MANAGEMENT OF DECEASED DONORS AND OUTCOMES OF DECEASED DONOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION.
    Kang, Seong Sik
    Lim, Hye Jin
    Koo, Tai Yeon
    Jeong, Jong Cheol
    Ahn, Curie
    Yang, Jaeseok
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (10) : S106 - S106