Cross-country evidence on the importance of Big Four auditors to equity pricing: The mediating role of legal institutions

被引:60
|
作者
El Ghoul, Sadok [1 ]
Guedhami, Omrane [2 ]
Pittman, Jeffrey [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6C 4G9, Canada
[2] Univ South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
Audit choice; Corporate governance; Cost of equity capital; IMPLIED COST; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AUDITING STANDARDS; EARNINGS QUALITY; LITIGATION RISK; RETURN; CHOICE; GROWTH; FIRMS; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We report large sample evidence on the importance of auditor choice to the ex ante cost of capital for public firms from 37 countries. In regressions that control for country, industry, and year fixed effects as well as other firm-level determinants, we find that corporate equity financing worldwide is cheaper when Big Four auditors monitor the financial reporting process, although this relation is weaker outside the U.S. where the implicit insurance coverage that auditors afford investors is much lower. Economically, our coefficient estimates imply that U.S. and non-U.S. public firms' cost of equity capital falls by, on average, 55 and 23 basis points, respectively, in the presence of a Big Four auditor. We also provide empirical support for the predictions that the equity pricing role of Big Four auditors is stronger in countries with better institutions governing investor protection and disclosure standards. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 81
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条