Five challenges to reconcile agricultural land use and forest ecosystem services in Southeast Asia

被引:12
|
作者
Carrasco, L. R. [1 ]
Papworth, S. K. [1 ]
Reed, J. [2 ]
Symes, W. S. [1 ]
Ickowitz, A. [2 ]
Clements, T. [3 ,4 ]
Peh, K. S. -H. [3 ,5 ]
Sunderland, T. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, 14 Sci Dr 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16000, Indonesia
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[4] Wildlife Conservat Soc, 2300 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[5] Univ Southampton, Ctr Biol Sci, Univ Rd, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[6] James Cook Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Trop Environm & Sustainabil Sci, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
关键词
forest economics; landscape conservation planning; payment for ecosystem services; well-being; bienestar; economia del bosque; pago por servicios ambientales; planificacion de la conservacion del paisaje; ECONOMIC VALUATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; WILD; COVER; VIETNAM; WORLD; DIETS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12786
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Southeast Asia possesses the highest rates of tropical deforestation globally and exceptional levels of species richness and endemism. Many countries in the region are also recognized for their food insecurity and poverty, making the reconciliation of agricultural production and forest conservation a particular priority. This reconciliation requires recognition of the trade-offs between competing land-use values and the subsequent incorporation of this information into policy making. To date, such reconciliation has been relatively unsuccessful across much of Southeast Asia. We propose an ecosystem services (ES) value-internalization framework that identifies the key challenges to such reconciliation. These challenges include lack of accessible ES valuation techniques; limited knowledge of the links between forests, food security, and human well-being; weak demand and political will for the integration of ES in economic activities and environmental regulation; a disconnect between decision makers and ES valuation; and lack of transparent discussion platforms where stakeholders can work toward consensus on negotiated land-use management decisions. Key research priorities to overcome these challenges are developing easy-to-use ES valuation techniques; quantifying links between forests and well-being that go beyond economic values; understanding factors that prevent the incorporation of ES into markets, regulations, and environmental certification schemes; understanding how to integrate ES valuation into policy making processes, and determining how to reduce corruption and power plays in land-use planning processes. Cinco Obstaculos para Reconciliar el Uso de Suelo Agricola y los Servicios Ambientales del Bosque en el Sureste Asiatico El sureste asiatico posee la tasa mas alta de deforestacion tropical a nivel mundial y niveles excepcionales de riqueza de especies y endemismos. Muchos paises de la region tambien son reconocidos por su inseguridad alimenticia y pobreza, lo que hace que la reconciliacion entre la produccion agricola y la conservacion del bosque sea una prioridad particular. Esta reconciliacion requiere del reconocimiento de las compensaciones entre los valores de uso de suelo en competencia y la incorporacion subsecuente de esta informacion a la realizacion de politicas. A la fecha, dicha reconciliacion ha sido relativamente infructuosa en casi todo el sureste asiatico. Proponemos un marco de trabajo de internalizacion de valores de los servicios ambientales (SA) que identifique los obstaculos clave para dicha reconciliacion. Estos obstaculos incluyen la carencia de tecnicas accesibles de valoracion de SA; el conocimiento limitado de las conexiones entre los bosques, la seguridad alimenticia y el bienestar humano; la baja demanda y la poca voluntad politica por integrar los SA a las actividades economicas y a la regulacion ambiental; una desconexion entre quienes toman las decisiones y la valoracion de los SA; y la falta de plataformas de discusion transparente en las que los accionistas puedan trabajar en obtener un consenso sobre las decisiones de manejo del uso de suelo negociado. Las prioridades clave de la investigacion para sobreponerse a estos obstaculos son el desarrollo de tecnicas de valoracion de SA que sean faciles de usar; cuantificar las conexiones entre los bosques y el bienestar que van mas alla de los valores economicos: entender los factores que previenen la incorporacion de los SA a los mercados, las regulaciones y los esquemas de certificacion ambiental; entender como integrar la valoracion de los SA a los procesos de elaboracion de politicas; y determinar como reducir la corrupcion y los juegos de poder en los procesos de planificacion del uso de suelo. Resumen
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 971
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Land use land cover dynamics and its implications for ecosystem services and livelihoods of Budongo forest adjacent communities
    Kule, Cosmus
    Waiswa, Daniel
    Obua, Joseph
    Twinomuhangi, Revocatus
    Babweteera, Fred
    Eryenyu, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 20 (04):
  • [42] Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use
    Benayas, Jose M. Rey
    Bullock, James M.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 6 (06) : 329 - 336
  • [43] Incorporating ecosystem services into agricultural management based on land use/cover change in Northeastern China
    Zhan, Jinyan
    Chu, Xi
    Li, Zhihui
    Jia, Siqi
    Wang, Guofeng
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 401 - 411
  • [44] Reconciling Life Cycle Environmental Impacts with Ecosystem Services: A Management Perspective on Agricultural Land Use
    Tang, Longlong
    Hayashi, Kiyotada
    Kohyama, Kazunori
    Leon, Ai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [45] Past and future impacts of land use and climate change on agricultural ecosystem services in the Czech Republic
    Lorencova, Eliska
    Frelichova, Jana
    Nelson, Edward
    Vackar, David
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 : 183 - 194
  • [46] The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change
    Metzger, MJ
    Rounsevell, MDA
    Acosta-Michlik, L
    Leemans, R
    Schrötere, D
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 114 (01) : 69 - 85
  • [47] Ecosystem Services from Small Forest Patches in Agricultural Landscapes
    Decocq, Guillaume
    Andrieu, Emilie
    Brunet, Jorg
    Chabrerie, Olivier
    De Frenne, Pieter
    De Smedt, Pallieter
    Deconchat, Marc
    Diekmann, Martin
    Ehrmann, Steffen
    Giffard, Brice
    Mifsud, Elena Gorriz
    Hansen, Karin
    Hermy, Martin
    Kolb, Annette
    Lenoir, Jonathan
    Liira, Jaan
    Moldan, Filip
    Prokofieva, Irina
    Rosenqvist, Lars
    Varela, Elsa
    Valdes, Alicia
    Verheyen, Kris
    Wulf, Monika
    CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2016, 2 (01): : 30 - 44
  • [48] Ecosystem Services from Small Forest Patches in Agricultural Landscapes
    Guillaume Decocq
    Emilie Andrieu
    Jörg Brunet
    Olivier Chabrerie
    Pieter De Frenne
    Pallieter De Smedt
    Marc Deconchat
    Martin Diekmann
    Steffen Ehrmann
    Brice Giffard
    Elena Gorriz Mifsud
    Karin Hansen
    Martin Hermy
    Annette Kolb
    Jonathan Lenoir
    Jaan Liira
    Filip Moldan
    Irina Prokofieva
    Lars Rosenqvist
    Elsa Varela
    Alicia Valdés
    Kris Verheyen
    Monika Wulf
    Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 30 - 44
  • [49] Urban Forest Ecosystem Services Vary with Land Use and Species: A Case Study of Kyoto City
    Kang, Jiefeng
    Hirabayashi, Satoshi
    Shibata, Shozo
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (01):
  • [50] The effect of payments for ecosystem services on forest cover, land use, and capacity building in northern Mexico
    Segura-Millan, Karla
    Perez-Verdin, Gustavo
    TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 12