Evaluation of the organisation and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed-methods study

被引:13
|
作者
van Gelderen, Saskia C. [1 ]
Zegers, Marieke [1 ]
Boeijen, Wilma [2 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ]
Robben, Paul B. [3 ,4 ]
Wollersheim, Hub C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Sci Ctr Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dutch Hlth Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; BOARD; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPROVEMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Hospital boards are legally responsible for safe healthcare. They need tools to assist them in their task of governing patient safety. Almost every Dutch hospital performs internal audits, but the effectiveness of these audits for hospital governance has never been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the organisation of internal audits and their effectiveness for hospitals boards to govern patient safety. Design and setting A mixed-methods study consisting of a questionnaire regarding the organisation of internal audits among all Dutch hospitals (n=89) and interviews with stakeholders regarding the audit process and experienced effectiveness of audits within six hospitals. Results Response rate of the questionnaire was 76% and 43 interviews were held. In every responding hospital, the internal audits followed the plan-do-check-act cycle. Every hospital used interviews, document analysis and site visits as input for the internal audit. Boards stated that effective aspects of internal audits were their multidisciplinary scope, their structured and in-depth approach, the usability to monitor improvement activities and to change hospital policy and the fact that results were used in meetings with staff and boards of supervisors. The qualitative methods (interviews and site visits) used in internal audits enable the identification of soft signals such as unsafe culture or communication and collaboration problems. Reported disadvantages were the low frequency of internal audits and the absence of soft signals in the actual audit reports. Conclusion This study shows that internal audits are regarded as effective for patient safety governance, as they help boards to identify patient safety problems, proactively steer patient safety and inform boards of supervisors on the status of patient safety. The description of the Dutch internal audits makes these audits replicable to other healthcare organisations in different settings, enabling hospital boards to complement their systems to govern patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Texas Hospitals' Perspectives About NICU Performance Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Doherty, Julie R.
    Schaefer, Andrew
    Goodman, David C.
    [J]. QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 32 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [42] Structure and Function of Observation Units in Children's Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Shanley, Leticia A.
    Hronek, Carla
    Hall, Matthew
    Alpern, Elizabeth R.
    Fieldston, Evan S.
    Hain, Paul D.
    Shah, Samir S.
    Macy, Michelle L.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2015, 15 (05) : 518 - 525
  • [43] Handling information about new drug safety issues in Dutch hospitals: A mixed-methods approach
    de Vries, Esther
    Bakker, Elisabeth
    Mol, Peter G. M.
    Denig, Petra
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 13 - 14
  • [44] Effectiveness and Utility of Flowcharts on Learning in a Classroom Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Zimmermann, Anthony E.
    King, Ethan E.
    Bose, Diptiman D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (01)
  • [45] Evaluation of the 'Talking Together' simulation communication training for 'goals of patient care' conversations: a mixed-methods study in five metropolitan public hospitals in Western Australia
    Brown, Janie
    Myers, Helen
    Eng, Derek
    Kilshaw, Lucy
    Abraham, Jillian
    Buchanan, Grace
    Eggimann, Liz
    Kelly, Michelle
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [46] Sampling targets to assess occupational health in occupational health and safety management system audits: a mixed-methods research in Japan
    Inoue, Shunsuke
    Kajiki, Shigeyuki
    Shimoda, Hayato
    Fujita, Amane
    Mori, Koji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2024, 66 (01)
  • [47] Evaluation of ethical reflections in community healthcare: A mixed-methods study
    Soderhamn, Ulrika
    Kjostvedt, Helga Tofte
    Slettebo, Ashild
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [48] A mixed-methods evaluation of health and safety hazards at a scrap metal recycling facility
    Neitzel, Richard L.
    Crollard, Allison
    Dominguez, Carlos
    Stover, Bert
    Seixas, Noah S.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (01) : 432 - 440
  • [49] Compliance With and Barriers to Implementing the Surgical Safety Checklist: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Akbuga, Gokcen Aydin
    Surme, Yeliz
    Esenkaya, Derya
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2023, 117 (02) : E1 - E10
  • [50] Parents' perspectives on safety in neonatal intensive care: a mixed-methods study
    Lyndon, Audrey
    Jacobson, Carrie H.
    Fagan, Kelly M.
    Wisner, Kirsten
    Franck, Linda S.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (11) : 902 - 909