Evaluation of the organisation and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed-methods study

被引:13
|
作者
van Gelderen, Saskia C. [1 ]
Zegers, Marieke [1 ]
Boeijen, Wilma [2 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ]
Robben, Paul B. [3 ,4 ]
Wollersheim, Hub C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Sci Ctr Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Qual & Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dutch Hlth Care Inspectorate, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-CARE; HEALTH-CARE; BOARD; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPROVEMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015506
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Hospital boards are legally responsible for safe healthcare. They need tools to assist them in their task of governing patient safety. Almost every Dutch hospital performs internal audits, but the effectiveness of these audits for hospital governance has never been evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the organisation of internal audits and their effectiveness for hospitals boards to govern patient safety. Design and setting A mixed-methods study consisting of a questionnaire regarding the organisation of internal audits among all Dutch hospitals (n=89) and interviews with stakeholders regarding the audit process and experienced effectiveness of audits within six hospitals. Results Response rate of the questionnaire was 76% and 43 interviews were held. In every responding hospital, the internal audits followed the plan-do-check-act cycle. Every hospital used interviews, document analysis and site visits as input for the internal audit. Boards stated that effective aspects of internal audits were their multidisciplinary scope, their structured and in-depth approach, the usability to monitor improvement activities and to change hospital policy and the fact that results were used in meetings with staff and boards of supervisors. The qualitative methods (interviews and site visits) used in internal audits enable the identification of soft signals such as unsafe culture or communication and collaboration problems. Reported disadvantages were the low frequency of internal audits and the absence of soft signals in the actual audit reports. Conclusion This study shows that internal audits are regarded as effective for patient safety governance, as they help boards to identify patient safety problems, proactively steer patient safety and inform boards of supervisors on the status of patient safety. The description of the Dutch internal audits makes these audits replicable to other healthcare organisations in different settings, enabling hospital boards to complement their systems to govern patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health Workers' Perspective on Patient Safety Incident Disclosure in Indonesian Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Dhamanti, Inge
    Juliasih, Ni Njoman
    Semita, I. Nyoman
    Zakaria, Nasriah
    Guo, How-Ran
    Sholikhah, Vina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2023, 16 : 1337 - 1348
  • [2] Nurses' perceptions of patient safety culture: a mixed-methods study
    Granel, Nina
    Manresa-Dominguez, Josep Maria
    Watson, Carolina Eva
    Gomez-Ibanez, Rebeca
    Bernabeu-Tamayo, Maria Dolors
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Nurses’ perceptions of patient safety culture: a mixed-methods study
    Nina Granel
    Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez
    Carolina Eva Watson
    Rebeca Gómez-Ibáñez
    Maria Dolors Bernabeu-Tamayo
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [4] Nursing technicians' professional training in patient safety: A mixed-methods study
    Rocha, Ruth Cardoso
    Avelino, Fernanda Valeria Silva Dantas
    Borges, Jose Wicto Pereira
    Araujo, Agostinho Antonio Cruz
    Bezerra, Maria Augusta Rocha
    Nunes, Benevina Maria Vilar Teixeira
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 31
  • [5] Patient Safety Culture in European Hospitals: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study
    Granel-Gimenez, Nina
    Palmieri, Patrick Albert
    Watson-Badia, Carolina E.
    Gomez-Ibanez, Rebeca
    Leyva-Moral, Juan Manuel
    Bernabeu-Tamayo, Maria Dolors
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (02)
  • [6] Implementing Patient Falls Education in Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Trial
    Heng, Hazel
    Kiegaldie, Debra
    Shaw, Louise
    Jazayeri, Dana
    Hill, Anne-Marie
    Morris, Meg E.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [7] Acceptance factors of digitalization in hospitals: a mixed-methods study
    Burmann, Anja
    Schepers, Susann
    Meister, Sven
    [J]. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 13 (05) : 843 - 859
  • [8] Acceptance factors of digitalization in hospitals: a mixed-methods study
    Anja Burmann
    Susann Schepers
    Sven Meister
    [J]. Health and Technology, 2023, 13 : 843 - 859
  • [9] A Safety Huddle Intervention in In-Patient Surgical Units: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Lee, Seung Eun
    Dahinten, V. Susan
    Kim, Eunkyung
    Lee, Sang Hwa
    Han, Soo Young
    Kim, Phill Ja
    Kim, Jung Yeon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 2023
  • [10] Patient safety culture as perceived by operating room professionals: a mixed-methods study
    Aouicha, Wiem
    Tlili, Mohamed Ayoub
    Sahli, Jihene
    Mtiraoui, Ali
    Ajmi, Thouraya
    Latiri, Houyem Said
    Chelbi, Souad
    Ben Rejeb, Mohamed
    Mallouli, Manel
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)