Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

被引:97
|
作者
Weber, Andreas [1 ]
von Weyhern, Claus [2 ]
Fend, Falko [2 ]
Schneider, Jochen [1 ]
Neu, Bruno [1 ]
Meining, Alexander [1 ]
Weidenbach, Hans [1 ]
Schmid, Roland M. [1 ]
Prinz, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 2, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Pathol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
关键词
brush cytology; forceps biopsy; cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin tumor; endoscopy; diagnostic approaches;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.14.1097
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the sensitivity of brush cytology and forceps biopsy in a homogeneous patient group with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Brush cytology and forceps biopsy were routinely performed in patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures. Fifty-eight consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) including forceps biopsy and brush cytology in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1995-2005. RESULTS: Positive results for malignancy were obtained in 24/58 patients (41.4%) by brush cytology and in 31/58 patients (53.4%) by forceps biopsy. The combination of both techniques brush cytology and forceps biopsy resulted only in a minor increase in diagnostic sensitivity to 60.3% (35/58 patients). In 20/58 patients (34.5%), diagnosis were obtained by both positive cytology and positive histology, in 11/58 (19%) by positive histology (negative cytology) and only 4/58 patients (6.9%) were confirmed by positive cytology (negative histology). CONCLUSION: Brush cytology and forceps biopsy have only limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant hilar tumors. In our eyes, additional diagnostic techniques should be evaluated and should become routine in patients with negative cytological and histological findings. (c) 2008 WJG. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1101
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DIAGNOSTIC SENSITIVITY OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG-TUMORS WITH THE FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPE - COMPARISON OF BRUSH BIOPSY, IMPRINT CYTOLOGY OF FORCEPS BIOPSY, AND HISTOLOGY OF FORCEPS BIOPSY
    POPP, W
    RAUSCHER, H
    RITSCHKA, L
    REDTENBACHER, S
    ZWICK, H
    DUTZ, W
    CANCER, 1991, 67 (01) : 72 - 75
  • [42] ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE BIOPSY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA
    KUBOTA, Y
    TAKAOKA, M
    TANI, K
    OGURA, M
    KIN, H
    TSUJI, K
    FUJIMURA, K
    MIZUNO, T
    INOUE, K
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (04) : A367 - A367
  • [43] Biliary hemostasis using an endoscopic plastic stent placement for uncontrolled hemobilia caused by transpapillary forceps biopsy (with video)
    Shinjo K.
    Matsubayashi H.
    Matsui T.
    Kawata N.
    Uemura S.
    Yamamoto Y.
    Ono H.
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016, 9 (2) : 86 - 88
  • [44] ENDOSCOPIC BRUSH CYTOLOGY AND BIOPSY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER OF THE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT
    QIZILBASH, AH
    CASTELLI, M
    KOWALSKI, MA
    CHURLY, A
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1980, 24 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [45] Brush cytology vs. endoscopic biopsy for the surveillance of Barrett's esophagus
    Kumaravel, A.
    Lopez, R.
    Brainard, J.
    Falk, G. W.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (10) : 800 - 805
  • [46] SpyGlass® Peroral Cholangioscopy and Cholangioscopic Forceps Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Negative ERCP Brush Cytology and Negative EUS-Guided FNA Results
    Siddiqui, Ali A.
    Mehendiratta, Vaibhav
    Jackson, Whitney E.
    Loren, David E.
    Kowalski, Thomas E.
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 390 - 390
  • [47] Comparison of bacterial diversity between duodenal samples obtained either using a cytology brush or an endoscopic biopsy forceps in dogs with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Suchodolski, J. S.
    Van House, A. M.
    Jergens, A. E.
    Steiner, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 21 (03) : 652 - 652
  • [48] Endoscopic and Percutaneous Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients with Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Kloek, Jaap J.
    van der Gaag, Niels A.
    Aziz, Yalda
    Rauws, Erik A. J.
    van Delden, Otto M.
    Lameris, Johan S.
    Busch, Olivier R. C.
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    van Gulik, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [49] Endoscopic and Percutaneous Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients with Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Jaap J. Kloek
    Niels A. van der Gaag
    Yalda Aziz
    Erik A. J. Rauws
    Otto M. van Delden
    Johan S. Lameris
    Olivier R. C. Busch
    Dirk J. Gouma
    Thomas M. van Gulik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2010, 14 : 119 - 125
  • [50] Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Hirano, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Eiichi
    Tsuchikawa, Takahiro
    Matsumoto, Joe
    Kawakami, Hiroshi
    Nakamura, Toru
    Kurashima, Yo
    Ebihara, Yuma
    Shichinohe, Toshiaki
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (08) : 533 - 540