ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT OF UNCITRAL MODEL LAW

被引:0
|
作者
Loutocky, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Law, Inst Law & Technol, Veveri 70, Brno 61180, Czech Republic
关键词
UNCITRAL; Online Dispute Resolution; Working Group III; Electronic Commerce;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The influence of modern technologies (especially of the Internet) has been enormous in last two decades. It had crucial impact mainly on the swift growth of cross-border electronic commerce. Traditional judicial mechanisms were unable to offer proportionate solution to deal with e-commerce diputes. Such situation had opened up an area for Online Dispute Resolution. Online Dispute Resolution rules are however being developed ad hoc recently. The necessity to unify this shattered area was foreseen by the UNCITRAL which had charged Working Group III with creation of the model law. This paper will focus on the main aspects of the model law. It will try to describe problematic areas as well as the current state of the development of such rules. It was predicted that model law should be already prepared however major conflicts between different law cultures slow down and limit further advancement. The paper in the end expresses the necessity to clearly define the scope of the model law to be possible to move further and to offer highly needed UNICTRAL rules for Online Dispute Resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital Family Justice: From Alternative Dispute Resolution to Online Dispute Resolution?
    Barton, Chris
    [J]. MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2020, 83 (06): : 1358 - 1362
  • [22] Digital family justice - from alternative dispute resolution to online dispute resolution?
    D'Almeida, Giselle Beran Medella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2021, 43 (02) : 231 - 233
  • [23] Digital Family Justice: From Alternative Dispute Resolution to Online Dispute Resolution?
    Barton, Chris
    [J]. MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2020,
  • [24] Dispute resolution choices A comparison of family dispute resolution, family law conferencing services and collaborative law
    Caruana, Catherine
    [J]. FAMILY MATTERS, 2010, (85) : 80 - 83
  • [25] AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    Gabuthy, Yannick
    Jacquemet, Nicolas
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2007, 58 (06): : 1309 - 1330
  • [26] The Legal Precedent in Online Dispute Resolution
    Carneiro, Davide
    Novais, Paulo
    Andrade, Francisco
    Zeleznikow, John
    Neves, Jose
    [J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS: JURIX 2009: THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2009, 205 : 47 - 52
  • [27] Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of Justice
    Rule, Colin
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 16, 2020, 16 : 277 - 292
  • [28] ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN REGULATORY AGENCIES
    Guerra, Sergio
    Caccia Salinas, Natasha Schmitt
    [J]. REVISTA DIREITO GV, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [29] Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution
    Walton, Douglas
    Godden, David
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2005, 13 (02) : 273 - 295
  • [30] THE SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
    Gao, Wei
    [J]. HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 47 : 445 - 474