ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT OF UNCITRAL MODEL LAW

被引:0
|
作者
Loutocky, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Law, Inst Law & Technol, Veveri 70, Brno 61180, Czech Republic
关键词
UNCITRAL; Online Dispute Resolution; Working Group III; Electronic Commerce;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The influence of modern technologies (especially of the Internet) has been enormous in last two decades. It had crucial impact mainly on the swift growth of cross-border electronic commerce. Traditional judicial mechanisms were unable to offer proportionate solution to deal with e-commerce diputes. Such situation had opened up an area for Online Dispute Resolution. Online Dispute Resolution rules are however being developed ad hoc recently. The necessity to unify this shattered area was foreseen by the UNCITRAL which had charged Working Group III with creation of the model law. This paper will focus on the main aspects of the model law. It will try to describe problematic areas as well as the current state of the development of such rules. It was predicted that model law should be already prepared however major conflicts between different law cultures slow down and limit further advancement. The paper in the end expresses the necessity to clearly define the scope of the model law to be possible to move further and to offer highly needed UNICTRAL rules for Online Dispute Resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ACTIVITY OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL) IN THE FIELD OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR)
    Tanul, Ciprian
    Stefanut, Iuliana
    [J]. CONFLICT STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2013, (02): : 50 - 87
  • [2] Online Dispute Resolution: The issues in Private International Law
    Nava Gonzalez, Wendolyne
    [J]. ANUARIO COLOMBIANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL-ACDI, 2020, 13 : 187 - 208
  • [3] A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution
    Karl Branting
    Sarah McLeod
    Sarah Howell
    Brandy Weiss
    Brett Profitt
    James Tanner
    Ian Gross
    David Shin
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2023, 31 : 465 - 490
  • [4] A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution
    Branting, Karl
    McLeod, Sarah
    Howell, Sarah
    Weiss, Brandy
    Profitt, Brett
    Tanner, James
    Gross, Ian
    Shin, David
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2023, 31 (03) : 465 - 490
  • [5] Online dispute resolution in e-commerce: is consensus in regulation UNCITRAL's utopian idea or a realistic ambition?
    Sampani, Constantina
    [J]. INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY LAW, 2021, 30 (03) : 235 - 254
  • [6] OAS Model Law and UNCITRAL Model Law: a Chilean view
    Cortes Beltran, Sergio
    [J]. UNIFORM LAW REVIEW, 2022, 27 (02) : 241 - 260
  • [7] ARBITRATION AND THE COURTS - THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW
    KERR, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY, 1985, 34 (JAN): : 1 - 24
  • [8] Online dispute resolution and bargaining
    Gabuthy Y.
    [J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2004, 17 (3) : 353 - 371
  • [9] Consumer Online Dispute Resolution
    Korobeynikov, T. S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - FAR EAST CON (ISCFEC 2020), 2020, 128 : 3323 - 3330
  • [10] Developing mechanisms for the resolution of international disputes: The UNCITRAL model law on international commercial conciliation
    Matias, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: IMPORTANT CONTEMPORARY QUESTIONS, 2003, : 190 - 208