Long-term follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: Comparative study of excimer lasers

被引:0
|
作者
Zalentein, Waldir Neira [1 ]
Tervo, Timo M. T. [1 ]
Holopainen, Juha M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Ophthalmol, Helsinki 00029, Finland
来源
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; THAN-6; DIOPTERS; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.025
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the long-term results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate myopia performed using a broad-beam laser system or a scanning-slit laser system. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: This follow-up study comprised eyes with myopia (-1.25 to -7.00 diopters [D]) or myopic astigmatism (astigmatism lower than -2.50 D) corrected by PRK using a broad-beam (Visx) or scanning-slit (Nidek) laser. Follow-up included a visit at 3 months and at more than 8 years. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction were recorded. RESULTS: The broad-beam group comprised 27 eyes and the scanning-slit group, 34 eyes. At the last postoperative follow-up, the UDVA was 0.0 or better in 55% of eyes in the broad-beam group and 65% of eyes in the scanning-slit group. The CDVA was 0.0 or better in all eyes in the broad-beam group and 96% of eyes in the scanning-slit group. Regarding predictability, 48% and 73% of the eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D of the intended spherical equivalent refraction. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 laser groups in any preoperative or postoperative parameter. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in UDVA, CDVA, or SE after PRK for low to moderate myopia between the broad-beam laser system and the scanning-slit laser system.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:138 / 143
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ten-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia
    Koshimizu, Junko
    Dhanuka, Raksha
    Yamaguchi, Tatsuo
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (12) : 1817 - 1825
  • [22] Five-year follow-up of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia
    Honda, N
    Hamada, N
    Amano, S
    Kaji, Y
    Hiraoka, T
    Oshika, T
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (02) : 116 - 120
  • [23] Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy results: Long-term follow-up
    Miyai, Takashi
    Miyata, Kazunori
    Nejima, Ryohei
    Honbo, Masato
    Minami, Keiichiro
    Amano, Shiro
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (09): : 1527 - 1531
  • [24] Long-term results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK): 5-year follow-up
    Wulff, K
    Wenzel, J
    Seiler, T
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 2593 - 2593
  • [25] Long-term follow-up of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) performed with a new algorithm
    Epstein, D
    Vinciguerra, P
    Azzolini, M
    Radice, P
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2287 - 2287
  • [26] Long-Term Follow-Up of Combined Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Crosslinking in Keratoconus Suspects
    Kymionis, George
    Kontadakis, George
    Grentzelos, Michael
    Petrelli, Myrsini
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 : 2403 - 2410
  • [27] EXCIMER-LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY - 12 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP
    LAWLESS, MA
    ROGERS, C
    COHEN, P
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1993, 159 (08) : 535 - &
  • [28] EXCIMER LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY - 18-MONTH FOLLOW-UP
    GARTRY, DS
    MUIR, MGK
    MARSHALL, J
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 99 (08) : 1209 - 1219
  • [29] Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. 5 years follow-up
    Ameline-Chalumeau, B
    Romeo, C
    Quesnot, S
    Reinstein, DZ
    Laroche, L
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S922 - S922
  • [30] 2-ZONE EXCIMER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY FOR MODERATE MYOPIA - 6 TO 18-MONTH FOLLOW-UP
    PIEBENGA, LW
    MATTA, CS
    DEITZ, MR
    TAUBER, J
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (07) : 1054 - 1059