The three factors of the psychoticism scale of SCL-90-R

被引:11
|
作者
Pedersen, Geir [1 ]
Urnes, Oyvind [1 ]
Kvarstein, Elfrida H. [1 ]
Karterud, Sigmund [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth & Addict, Dept Personal Psychiat, POB 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
PERSONALITY-DISORDER; FIT INDEXES; SYMPTOMS; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; DISCRIMINANT; COEFFICIENT; CONVERGENT; PSYCHOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/pmh.1278
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Former studies have repeatedly found the psychoticism (PSY) scale of Symptom Checklist-90-Revised to be a heterogeneous construct. The aim of this study was to confirm and further explore the nature of this heterogeneity within a large sample of patients with mainly personality disorders. Within a total sample of 3 794 patients, one-half was randomly selected for explorative factor analysis in order to assess the internal structure of the PSY scale and the other half to cross-validate the findings by a confirmatory factor analysis. The total sample was then used to assess associations between the components from the factor analyses and several clinical measures and diagnoses. A one-factor solution of the PSY scale yielded poor fit to the data, but a proposed structure of three latent constructs was confirmed by good model fit. The three subsets of the PSY scale, labelled metacognitive dysfunction, self-accusation and detachment, shared variance with different personality disorders and different aspects of psychopathology, e.g. previous psychotic episodes. The heterogeneous PSY scale of SCL-90-R can be divided into three meaningful clinical concepts, reflecting different aspects of psychosis-near experiences. The factors warrant confirmation in other populations. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 255
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differences among diagnostic groups of psychosomatic patients in the symptom checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R): Consequences for the use of the SCL-90-R in the assessment of changes over time
    Geiser, F
    Imbierowicz, K
    Schilling, G
    Conrad, R
    Liedtke, R
    PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2000, 50 (12) : 447 - 453
  • [22] SCL-90-R scoring of stress after myocardial infarction
    Fenner, E
    Michels, G
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK, 2003, 98 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [23] The Symptom Check-List-90-R (SCL-90-R): A German validation study
    N. Schmitz
    N. Hartkamp
    J. Kiuse
    G.H. Franke
    G. Reister
    W. Tress
    Quality of Life Research, 2000, 9 : 185 - 193
  • [24] The symptom check-list-90-R (SCL-90-R): A German validation study
    Schmitz, N
    Hartkamp, N
    Kiuse, J
    Franke, GH
    Reister, G
    Tress, W
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [25] Clinical and statistical significance using the symptom check list 90 R (SCL-90-R)
    Schmitz, N
    DaviesOsterkamp, S
    DIAGNOSTICA, 1997, 43 (01): : 80 - 96
  • [26] SCL-90-R profiles in a sample of severely violent psychiatric inpatients
    Bjorkly, S
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2002, 28 (06) : 446 - 457
  • [27] FEIGNING PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN TEMPORARY DISABILITY: FORENSIC UTILITY OF THE SCL-90-R
    Vilarino, Manuel
    Amado, Barbara G.
    Martin-Pena, Javier
    PSICOLOGIA JURIDICA Y FORENSE: INVESTIGACION PARA LA PRACTICA PROFESIONAL, 2020, 16 : 25 - 39
  • [28] UNIDIMENSIONALITY OF SCL-90-R SCALES IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT CRISIS SAMPLES
    BONYNGE, ER
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 49 (02) : 212 - 215
  • [29] The SCL-90-R as a screening instrument in the psychosomatic counselling and liaison service
    Hardt, J.
    Beutel, M. E.
    PSYCHOTHERAPIE PSYCHOSOMATIK MEDIZINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2007, 57 (02) : 87 - 87
  • [30] Pilot study on the psychologic evaluation of prosthesis incompatibility using the SCL-90-R scale and the CES-D scale
    Eitner, Stephan
    Wichmann, Manfred
    Heckmann, Josef
    Holst, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2006, 19 (05) : 482 - 490