EFFICIENCY OF RUSSIAN INSTITUTIONS SUPPORT FOR NON-RESOURCE AND NON-ENERGY EXPORTS

被引:0
|
作者
Sudakov, Sergei S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Finance Russian Federat, Financial Res Inst, Ctr Macroecon Res, FRI, 3,B 2 Nastasyinsky Lane, Moscow 127006, Russia
关键词
non-resource non-energy exports; non-tariff measures; promotion institutions; financial and non-financial support measures; export support efficiency; PROMOTION PROGRAMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-1-49-77
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The current study analyzes the types of measures aimed at supporting exporters. The article focuses on the analysis of support for Russian exporters of non-resource non-energy goods, as well as institutions that act as government agents to provide this support. The hypothesis of the study: Russian export support institutions have had a positive impact on the growth of non-resource non-energy exports from Russia by increasing the efficiency of their work and provided support measures. In the course of testing the hypothesis, several nuances were revealed. In particular, Russian publicly available information on the volume of support for exporters, the volume of non-resource non-energy exports from Russia is quite scarce. At the same time, the available data indicate that Russia remains dependent on energy exports. The analysis showed that during the period of active promotion of exports from Russia since 2015, there are no obvious trends in the growth of exports of non-resource non-energy goods. At the same time, there are no obvious trends in improving the efficiency of support institutions and the provided support measures: a case study of one of the non-financial support measures has shown that this measure is duplicated by information from international organizations. Based on the identified relationships, the article makes inferences regarding a possible increase in the efficiency of export support institutions, as well as the measures themselves. The findings also promote streamlining the requirements for the provision of support, as well as strengthening interaction with international organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 77
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Macroeconomic impacts of non-resource revenue mobilization in CEMAC
    Melina, Giovanni
    Poplawski-Ribeiro, Marcos
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (09) : 721 - 726
  • [22] Only non-energy benefits from the adoption of energy efficiency measures? A novel framework
    Cagno, Enrico
    Moschetta, Davide
    Trianni, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 1319 - 1333
  • [23] Energy effects of non-energy policies: Minimum wage standard and enterprise energy efficiency in China
    Zhao, Yueyang
    Mao, Jinzhou
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [24] Non-resource inputs to estimation of Ore Reserves - The modifying factors
    Appleyard, G.R.
    Smith, C.L.
    Monograph Series - Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2001, 23 : 325 - 332
  • [25] Labor productivity in the non-resource sectors of the Russian economy: What determines firm-level growth?
    Simachev, Yury, V
    Kuzyk, Mikhail G.
    Fedyunina, Anna A.
    Zaytsev, Alexander A.
    Yurevich, Maxim A.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2021, (03): : 31 - 67
  • [27] Implementation of energy efficiency measures in compressed air systems: barriers, drivers and non-energy benefits
    Therese Nehler
    Ricardo Parra
    Patrik Thollander
    Energy Efficiency, 2018, 11 : 1281 - 1302
  • [28] Brazilian sugarcane bagasse: Energy and non-energy consumption
    Hofsetz, Kelly
    Silva, Maria Aparecida
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 46 : 564 - 573
  • [29] Elasticity of substitution between energy and non-energy factors explaining from energy efficiency by threshold effect
    Zha, Donglan
    Zhou, Dequn
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1912 - 1916
  • [30] Linking energy efficiency measures in industrial compressed air systems with non-energy benefits - A review
    Nehler, Therese
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 89 : 72 - 87