共 50 条
Cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and quality of life data from the Australian early access program
被引:11
|作者:
Parente, Phillip
[1
]
Ng, Siobhan
[2
]
Parnis, Francis
[3
]
Guminski, Alex
[4
]
Gurney, Howard
[5
]
机构:
[1] Monash Univ, Box Hill Hosp, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] St John God Private Hosp, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Adelaide Canc Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Royal North Shore Hosp, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[5] Westmead Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词:
cabazitaxel;
early access program;
quality of life;
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer;
safety;
COMPASSIONATE-USE PROGRAM;
MITOXANTRONE PLUS PREDNISONE;
DOCETAXEL;
TRIAL;
EAP;
D O I:
10.1111/ajco.12679
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Aim: Cabazitaxel is a next generation taxane that has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose disease progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy. A worldwide early access program (EAP) study was established to provide access to cabazitaxel ahead of commercial availability and to evaluate its safety and tolerability. The Australian EAP included patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the impact of cabazitaxel on quality of life (QoL). The final safety and QoL results from the Australian EAP for cabazitaxel are reported. Methods: Australian patients with mCRPC previously treated with a docetaxel-containing regimen received cabazitaxel (25 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks plus prednisone/prednisolone (10 mg daily) until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, physician's decision or patient's refusal of further treatment. QoL data was collected using the AQoL-8D questionnaire. Results: 104 patients from 18 Australian sites (median age at baseline, 70) enrolled in the EAP and completed at least one AQoL-8D questionnaire. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of cabazitaxel. 67 patients (64.4%) experienced grade >= 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the most frequent TEAEs were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, diarrhoea, and vomiting. QoL scores remained stable with increasing treatment cycles. Conclusion: The results suggest that the safety profile cabazitaxel is manageable in the Australian clinical practice setting and that QoL is maintained with little or no detrimental effect of cabazitaxel in patients continuing on treatment without disease progression.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 399
页数:9
相关论文