Gamma-ray spectrometry as versatile tool in soil science: A critical review

被引:49
|
作者
Reinhardt, Nadja [1 ]
Herrmann, Ludger [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Soil Sci & Land Evaluat, Emil Wolff Str 27, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
K-40/Th-232/U-238; digital soil mapping; soil sensing; radionuclide; PLANT-AVAILABLE POTASSIUM; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; ORGANIC-CARBON; NATURAL RADIONUCLIDES; PARENT MATERIALS; AIRBORNE; URANIUM; EROSION; CS-137; RADIOMETRICS;
D O I
10.1002/jpln.201700447
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Gamma-ray spectrometry is an established method in geo-sciences. This article gives an overview on fundamentals of gamma-ray spectrometry that are relevant to soil science including basic technical aspects, and discusses influencing factors, inconsistencies, limitations, and open questions related to the method. Gamma-ray spectrometry relies on counting gamma quanta during radionuclide decay of K-40, U-238, and Th-232, but secular equilibrium for the decay series of U and Th must be given as decays of their respective daughter radionuclides are used for determination. Secular equilibrium for U and Th decay series, however, is not always given leading to, e.g., anomalies in U concentration measurements. For soil science, gamma-ray spectrometry is of specific value since it does not only detect a signal from the landscape surface, but integrates information over a certain volume. Besides, different spatial scales can be covered using either ground-based or airborne sensing techniques. Together with other remote sensing methods, gamma signatures can provide completive information for understanding land forming processes and soil properties distributions. At first, signals depend on bedrock composition. The signals are in second order altered by weathering processes leading to more interpretation opportunities and challenges. Due to their physico-chemical properties, radionuclides behave differently in soils and their properties can be distinguished via the resulting signatures. Hence, gamma signatures of soils are specific for local environments. Processes like soil erosion can superimpose gamma signals from in situ weathering. Soil mappings, available K and texture determination, or peat and soil erosion mapping are possible applications being discussed in this review.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 27
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Natural radioactivity and radiological hazard assessment of soil using gamma-ray spectrometry
    Zubair, Mohd
    Verma, Deepak
    Azam, Ameer
    Roy, Sukanta
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2013, 155 (04) : 467 - 473
  • [42] Airborne gamma-ray spectrometry: Potential for regolith-soil mapping and characterization
    Martelet, G.
    Nehlig, P.
    Arrouays, D.
    Messner, F.
    Tourliere, B.
    Laroche, B.
    Deparis, J.
    Saby, N. P. A.
    de Forges, A. C. Richer
    Jolivet, C.
    Ratie, C.
    GLOBALSOILMAP: BASIS OF THE GLOBAL SPATIAL SOIL INFORMATION SYSTEM, 2014, : 401 - 407
  • [43] Determination of radon concentration in soil gas by gamma-ray spectrometry of olive oil
    Al-Azmi, Darwish
    Karunakara, N.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2007, 42 (03) : 486 - 490
  • [44] Gamma-ray burst science with GLAST
    Bing Zhang
    First GLAST Symposium, 2007, 921 : 261 - 264
  • [45] Gamma-ray bursts: A critical analysis
    Kundt, W
    VULCANO WORKSHOP 1998 - FRONTIER OBJECTS IN ASTROPHYSICS AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 1999, 65 : 303 - 309
  • [46] Gamma-Ray Background: A Review
    Kneiske, T. M.
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2008, 8 : 219 - 225
  • [47] A VERSATILE GAMMA-RAY ANALYZER SYSTEM FOR ACTIVATION ANALYSIS
    JOHNSON, RA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1967, 10 (01): : 86 - &
  • [48] A SHORT, CRITICAL REVIEW ON GAMMA-RAY EMISSION FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS
    Colafrancesco, Sergio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2009, 18 (10): : 1541 - 1544
  • [49] GAMMA-RAY SPECTROMETRY DATA-PROCESSING
    NAUDY, H
    GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 38 (06) : 1215 - 1215
  • [50] MEASUREMENT OF URANIUM BY AIRBORNE GAMMA-RAY SPECTROMETRY
    GRASTY, RL
    GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 38 (06) : 1202 - 1202