Evaluation of the measurement performance of the scanning mobility particle sizer and aerodynamic particle sizer

被引:88
|
作者
Sioutas, C [1 ]
Abt, E
Wolfson, JM
Koutrakis, P
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Civil Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/027868299304903
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The performance of the Scanning Mobility particle Sizer (SIMPS, TSI Model 3934) and the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, TSI Model 3310A) were evaluated to assess their ability to obtain mass concentrations from near real-time particle number concentration measurements made as a function of particle size. Tests were performed by generating monodisperse (polystyrene latex microspheres, 0.05-9.20 mu m) and polydisperse aerosols (potassium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) approximate to 0.16-0.30 mu m) and comparing mass concentrations determined by the SMPS and APS, with concentrations measured gravimetrically on Teflon filters. Previous performance evaluation tests of these instruments has focused primarily on their ability to measure particle number concentrations (Kinney et al. 1991; Wang and Flagan 1990) or mass concentrations of polydisperse aerosols with mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) of about 0.7-2.5 mu m (Peters et al. 1993). Findings from the monodisperse aerosol tests indicate that the mass concentrations obtained by the APS compared similarly to those obtained using the gravimetric method for particle sizes between 0.5-9.2 mu m. Similarly, SMPS measurements were in good agreement with the gravimetric analysis for particle sizes between 0.3-0.5 mu m. However, for particles less than 0.30 mu m, the SMPS overestimated their mass concentrations by a factor of 1.5-1.6. Tests using polydisperse aerosols showed that at particle size ranges from 0.09-0.18 mu m and from 0.18-0.29 mu m, the SMPS also overestimated mass concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 92
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty propagation using the Monte Carlo method in the measurement of airborne particle size distribution with a scanning mobility particle sizer
    Coquelin, L.
    Le Brusquet, L.
    Fischer, N.
    Gensdarmes, F.
    Motzkus, C.
    Mace, T.
    Fleury, G.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (05)
  • [22] INLET EFFICIENCY STUDY FOR THE TSI AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER
    KINNEY, PD
    PUI, DYH
    [J]. PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 1995, 12 (04) : 188 - 193
  • [23] CALIBRATION AND USE OF THE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER (APS 3300)
    BARON, PA
    [J]. AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 5 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [24] Analytical deconvolution of smearing effect for inversion of scanning mobility particle sizer data
    Chen, Dexian
    Sun, Cuizhi
    Zhao, Jun
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 316
  • [25] A universal calibration curve for the TSI aerodynamic particle sizer
    Tsai, CJ
    Chen, SC
    Huang, CH
    Chen, DR
    [J]. AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (05) : 467 - 474
  • [26] PARTICLE AND DROPLET SIZER
    不详
    [J]. POWDER METALLURGY INTERNATIONAL, 1978, 10 (02): : 99 - 99
  • [27] Validation of TiO2 particle-size distribution measured by scanning mobility particle sizer
    Cheng, Meng-Dawn
    Ford, Emory A.
    DePaoli, David W.
    Kenik, Edward A.
    Angelini, Peter
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (19) : 6269 - 6272
  • [28] PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF 3 PERSONAL CYCLONE MODELS, USING AN AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER
    MAYNARD, AD
    KENNY, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1995, 26 (04) : 671 - 684
  • [29] Development of a differential mobility particle sizer for atmospheric aerosols
    Müschenborn, P
    Otten, F
    Neumann, S
    Trampe, A
    Fissan, H
    Horn, HG
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2002, : 100 - 108
  • [30] Effects of exponentially decaying and growing concentrations on particle size distribution from a scanning mobility particle sizer
    Lee, Handol
    Yook, Se-Jin
    Ahn, Kang-Ho
    [J]. AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (10) : 1135 - 1143