Refurbishment criteria performance assessment methodologies based on a multiple-criteria approach

被引:6
|
作者
Chiang, Ting-Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] NTUST, Dept Architecture, 43,Sec 4,Keelung Rd, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
关键词
Old and dilapidated buildings; Building refurbishment; Engineering management; Decision support; Fuzzy logic theory; DECISION-MAKING MODEL; FUZZY DELPHI METHOD; URBAN GREEN-SPACE; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; ENERGY; DESIGN; SELECTION; SYSTEM; AHP; RENOVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10901-020-09752-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Half of Taiwan's old buildings, including those located in the historical center, are in advanced stages of degradation and lack regular maintenance. However, the old and dilapidated buildings that are still in good condition can be improved by being aware about their sustainability with the considerable growth of the refurbishment market. This study aims to propose a systematic method, i.e., residential building refurbishment criteria system (RBRCS), to evaluate the refurbishment performance based on multiple criteria, which can be applied to the buildings located in urban areas. This method can be used as decision support for various sustainable renovation projects and the evaluation of building renovations. RBRCS has been developed based on six case studies conducted with respect to the renovation projects in Taipei City, Taiwan, and the fuzzy Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, and fuzzy logic theory have been tested and validated with respect to these cases. The analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic control are used to record the customer preferences and perceptions. Further, we demonstrated the benefit of our proposed methodology when compared with the existing sequential model-based optimization methods. This system comprises a methodology in a management system structured to encompass constraints, technical recommendations, and sustainable practices that are applicable to refurbish an old building. This study concludes that the analytic hierarchy process combined with the fuzzy logic theory is an efficient, low-cost, and robust method to select the superior green refurbishment option with respect to the minimum time and cost.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 282
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Multiple-criteria performance ranking based on profile distributions: An application to university research evaluations
    Kunsch, Pierre L.
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    [J]. MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2018, 154 : 48 - 64
  • [33] Combining Scores in Multiple-Criteria Assessment Systems: The Impact of Combination Rule
    McBee, Matthew T.
    Peters, Scott J.
    Waterman, Craig
    [J]. GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2014, 58 (01) : 69 - 89
  • [34] A diversified AHP-tree approach for multiple-criteria supplier selection
    Toly Chen
    [J]. Computational Management Science, 2021, 18 : 431 - 453
  • [35] Shipping enterprise performance evaluation under uncertainty base on multiple-criteria evidential reasoning approach
    Bao, Tian-tian
    Xie, Xin-lian
    Long, Pei-yin
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25 : 2761 - 2772
  • [36] Multiple-criteria decision analysis techniques for anaerobic digester technology assessment
    Tolessa, Amsalu
    Goosen, Neill J.
    Louw, Tobias M.
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [37] Using a Benchmark in Case-Based Multiple-Criteria Ranking
    Chen, Ye
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2009, 39 (02): : 358 - 368
  • [38] Managing uncertainty in multiple-criteria decision making related to sustainability assessment
    Dorini, Gianluca
    Kapelan, Zoran
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (01) : 133 - 139
  • [39] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR APPROACH TO MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ZIONTS, S
    WALLENIUS, J
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1984, 229 : 54 - 62
  • [40] Managing uncertainty in multiple-criteria decision making related to sustainability assessment
    Gianluca Dorini
    Zoran Kapelan
    Adisa Azapagic
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2011, 13 : 133 - 139