Deictic disturbances after right hemisphere stroke

被引:4
|
作者
Tallberg, IM [1 ]
机构
[1] Huddinge Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Logoped & Phoniatr, S-14186 Huddinge, Sweden
关键词
right hemisphere stroke; reduplicative confabulation; semantic projections; deictic disturbances; self-image; mental;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00064-3
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Confabulation is a symptom of a cognitive disorder with consequences for communication. Linguistic investigations based on the speech of confabulating individuals are rare, especially when the focus is on semantic-pragmatic aspects. This study is based on material collected from conversations with an elderly, previously non-demented woman suffering from a stroke in the right posterior hemisphere. Sections with confabulate speech were analyzed from a semantic-pragmatic point of view. A method for line-by-line investigation of the confabulate construction was developed. The analysis focuses on semantic projections and on the linguistic cueing of cognitive structures. The results indicate that confabulation is a semantic-pragmatic disorder originating in the lack of a deictic center. Deictic spaces resulting in projections of old, semantic structures provided answers when appropriate structures were not available. The confabulations were created in interaction and were determined by the context. Finally, the results reveal how the confabulating individual projected an image of herself by the use of deixis. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1327
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Swallowing after Right Hemisphere Stroke: Oral versus Pharyngeal Deficits
    Theurer, Julie A.
    Johnston, Jennifer L.
    Taves, Donald H.
    Bach, David
    Hachinski, Vladimir
    Martin, Ruth E.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 32 (03): : 114 - 122
  • [32] Neglect after right hemisphere stroke - A smaller floodlight for distributed attention
    Barrett, AM
    Beversdorf, DQ
    Crucian, GP
    Heilman, KM
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 972 - 978
  • [33] Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke
    Davis, GA
    ONeilPirozzi, TM
    Coon, M
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 56 (02) : 183 - 210
  • [34] Recovery from unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke
    Appelros, P
    Nydevik, I
    Karlsson, GM
    Thorwalls, A
    Seiger, Å
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (08): : 471 - 477
  • [35] Aphasia and right hemisphere syndromes in stroke
    Jordan L.C.
    Hillis A.E.
    [J]. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2005, 5 (6) : 458 - 464
  • [36] Is right-hemisphere stroke underrecognized?
    Foerch, C
    Misselwitz, B
    Sitzer, M
    Neumann-Haefelin, T
    [J]. STROKE, 2005, 36 (02) : 442 - 442
  • [37] One right can make a left: sentence processing in the right hemisphere after perinatal stroke
    Martin, Kelly C.
    Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    Chambers, Catherine E.
    Giannetti, Margot
    Dromerick, Alexander W.
    Carpenter, Jessica L.
    Berl, Madison M.
    Gaillard, William D.
    Newport, Elissa L.
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2023, 33 (23) : 11257 - 11268
  • [38] The right hemisphere is important for driving-related cognitive function after stroke
    Shimonaga, Koji
    Hama, Seiji
    Tsuji, Toshio
    Yoshimura, Kazumasa
    Nishino, Shinya
    Yanagawa, Akiko
    Soh, Zu
    Matsushige, Toshinori
    Mizoue, Tatsuya
    Onoda, Keiichi
    Yamashita, Hidehisa
    Yamawaki, Shigeto
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (02) : 977 - 985
  • [39] Spatial remapping impairments underlie Constructional Apraxia after right hemisphere stroke
    Russell, C.
    Deidda, C.
    Husain, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 : 463 - 463
  • [40] Communicative Clusters after a Right-Hemisphere Stroke: Are There Universal Clinical Profiles?
    Ferre, Perrine
    Fonseca, Rochele Paz
    Ska, Bernadette
    Joanette, Yves
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2012, 64 (04) : 199 - 207