Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms

被引:3
|
作者
O'Neill, Lorcan [1 ,2 ]
Calderon Diaz, Julia Adriana [1 ]
Rodrigues da Costa, Maria [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Oakes, Sinnead [3 ,5 ]
Leonard, Finola C. [2 ]
Manzanilla, Edgar Garcia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Pig Dev Dept, Irish Food & Agr Author, Moorepk, Fermoy P61 C996, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Vet Med, Dublin D04 W6F6 4, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Publ Hlth, Cork T12 K8AF, Ireland
[4] Scotlands Rural Coll, Epidemiol Res Unit, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Northern Fac, Inverness IV2 5NA, Scotland
[5] Dublin Port, Dept Agr Food & Marine, Dublin D02 WK12, Ireland
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
antimicrobial use; biosecurity; Ireland; pigs; respiratory disease; risk factors; USAGE; HERDS; REDUCTION; PATTERNS; AGENTS; FOOD; ASSOCIATIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; BIOSECURITY; VACCINATION;
D O I
10.3390/ani11102828
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major threat to public health. There are concerns that antimicrobial use (AMU) in agriculture has a role in the development of AMR. Pigs are one of the main consumers of veterinary antimicrobials and a better understanding of the drivers for AMU in this sector will help in efforts to reduce use. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between antimicrobial use, farm characteristics, biosecurity, the presence of respiratory disease on the farm and health management practices on Irish pig farms. Farms that manufactured their feed on-site had lower total AMU than farms that purchased their feed from a feed mill. Higher levels of lung abscesses and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining around the heart), both indicators of respiratory disease, were associated with increased AMU. Higher levels of pericarditis were also associated with increased use of critically important antimicrobials. Farms vaccinating against swine influenza also had higher AMU. Farms that administered prophylactic antimicrobial treatments to piglets had higher use of individual treatments and critically important antimicrobials. The results from this study show that prophylaxis and respiratory disease are the main drivers of AMU on Irish pig farms. These findings highlight areas of farm management where interventions may aid in reducing AMU on Irish pig farms. The threat to public health posed by antimicrobial resistance in livestock production means that the pig sector is a particular focus for efforts to reduce antimicrobial use (AMU). This study sought to investigate the risk factors for AMU in Irish pig production. Antimicrobial use data were collected from 52 farrow-to-finish farms. The risk factors investigated were farm characteristics and performance, biosecurity practices, prevalence of pluck lesions at slaughter and serological status for four common respiratory pathogens and vaccination and prophylactic AMU practices. Linear regression models were used for quantitative AMU analysis and risk factors for specific AMU practices were investigated using logistic regression. Farms that milled their own feed had lower total AMU (p < 0.001), whereas higher finisher mortality (p = 0.043) and vaccinating for swine influenza (p < 0.001) increased AMU. Farms with higher prevalence of pericarditis (p = 0.037) and lung abscesses (p = 0.046) used more group treatments. Farms with higher prevalence of liver milk spot lesions (p = 0.018) and farms practising prophylactic AMU in piglets (p = 0.03) had higher numbers of individual treatments. Farms practising prophylactic AMU in piglets (p = 0.002) or sows (p = 0.062) had higher use of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. This study identified prophylactic use and respiratory disease as the main drivers for AMU in Irish pig production. These findings highlight areas of farm management where interventions may aid in reducing AMU on Irish pig farms.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Antimicrobial use in dairy farms plateauing
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2023, 192 (06) : 240 - 240
  • [42] Antimicrobial use on fur farms questioned
    Loeb, Josh
    Larson-Orhougbe, Okemute
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2023, 193 (04) : 133 - 133
  • [43] Antimicrobial use on Canadian dairy farms
    Saini, V.
    McClure, J. T.
    Leger, D.
    Dufour, S.
    Sheldon, A. G.
    Scholl, D. T.
    Barkema, H. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (03) : 1209 - 1221
  • [44] Tool to measure antimicrobial use on farms
    Hyde, Robert
    Green, Martin
    Remnant, John
    Down, Peter
    Huxley, Jon
    Davies, Peers
    Hudson, Chris
    Breen, James
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2017, 180 (07) : 183 - 183
  • [45] Antimicrobial Use On Canadian Dairy Farms
    Saini, Vineet
    McClure, J. Trenton
    Leger, David
    Barkema, Herman W.
    [J]. Advances in Dairy Technology, Vol 23, 2011, 23 : 380 - 380
  • [46] Effect of antimicrobial use and other risk factors on antimicrobial resistance in pneumococci
    Kristinsson, KG
    [J]. MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 1997, 3 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [47] Cutting antimicrobial use on dairy farms
    Mills, Georgina
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2018, 182 (18) : 499 - 499
  • [49] Spatiotemporal dynamics and risk factors of rotavirus A circulation in backyard pig farms in a Philippine setting
    Murao, Lyre Anni E.
    Bacus, Michael G.
    Junsay, Nicole Xyza T.
    Albarillo, Denia Lou D.
    Otero, Ma. Catherine B.
    Buenaventura, Sheryl Grace C.
    Ligue, Kim Dianne B.
    Alviola, Pedro A.
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2019, 51 (04) : 929 - 937
  • [50] Prevalence and some risk factors associated with trichinellosis in backyard pig farms in Zaria, Nigeria
    Momoh, Halimat Asabe
    Bello, Mohammed
    Inabo, Helen
    Wada, Yusuf
    Adole, Enechojo Bernadette
    Madaiki, Blessed Dauda
    Aregbe, Elizabeth Adenike
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2013, 45 (05) : 1149 - 1152