Experimental study comparing face-to-face and online teaching/learning of an English subject

被引:0
|
作者
De Juan Gonzalez, Pilar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
关键词
Comparative study; face-to-face vs on-line learning; e-learning; CALL; LEARNERS; COMPREHENSION; DISTANCE; TEXT; PROFICIENCY; FEEDBACK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This is an experimental comparative study to ascertain the possible existencc of differences in the achievement levels of two groups of university students who studied the same English subject, English for Tourism, with an intermediate level, during the same semester and with the same teacher. One of the groups followed a face-to-face method, whereas the other followed an online one. The quantitative research was carried out through some initial and final tests which determined the level achieved in each communicative skill. These were complemented with two qualitative research instruments, a questionnaire filled in by the students and two diaries written by the teacher describing the implementation of both subjects. The findings show that the on-line group achieved better results in the written interaction and listening skills and similar results in the other skills.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 133
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applying the scholarship of teaching and learning: student perceptions, behaviours and success online and face-to-face
    Horspool, Agi
    Lange, Carsten
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (01) : 73 - 88
  • [22] Connectivity: A Framework for Understanding Effective Language Teaching in Face-to-face and Online Learning Communities
    Senior, Rose
    [J]. RELC JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [23] EMPOWERING FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING WITH ONLINE LEARNING AT UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL
    Arnal, Ana
    Galindo, Carlos
    Gregori, Pablo
    Martinez, Vicente
    [J]. INTED2017: 11TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2017, : 742 - 747
  • [24] EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH IN BUSINESS ENGLISH E-LEARNING COURSE AND FACE-TO-FACE COURSE: THE STUDY PROPER
    Kucirkova, Lenka
    Kucera, Petr
    Vydrova, Hana Vostra
    [J]. EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2013, 2013, : 347 - 353
  • [25] EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF 4 FACE-TO-FACE TEACHING STRATEGIES
    WOOD, D
    WOOD, H
    MIDDLETON, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 1 (02) : 131 - 147
  • [26] Applying 'Active Learning' by Online and Face-to-Face Instructors
    Pundak, David
    Herscovitz, Orit
    Shacham, Miri
    [J]. IMSCI'11: THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SOCIETY, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL II, 2011, : 140 - 145
  • [27] Using Online learning in a traditional face-to-face environment
    Kozlowski, D
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN NURSING, 2002, 20 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [28] Feedback as a Powerful Teaching Tool: Online Versus Face-to-Face
    Nistor, Cristina Mihaela
    Comanetchi, Doina
    [J]. NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND REDESIGNING LEARNING SPACES, VOL II, 2019, : 110 - 115
  • [29] COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ONLINE HYBRID AND FACE-TO-FACE TEACHING METHODS
    Sertsu, Sahlemedhin
    Chacon, Fabio
    [J]. INTED2012: INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2012, : 6266 - 6271
  • [30] COMPARING ONLINE WITH FACE-TO-FACE INTERVENTION IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY
    Constantino, Rose Eva
    Braxter, Betty
    Ren, Dianxu
    Burroughs, Josepth
    Doswell, Willa
    Wu, Linden
    Hwang, Huhae
    Klem, Mary Lou
    Joshi, James B. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S198 - S198