R&D Investment timing, default and capital structure

被引:1
|
作者
Bragoli, Daniela [2 ]
Cortelezzi, Flavia [1 ]
Giannoccolo, Pierpaolo [3 ]
Marseguerra, Giovanni [2 ]
机构
[1] Insubria Univ, Dept Law Econ & Culture, Como, Italy
[2] Catholic Univ Milan, Dept Math & Econometr, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, Bologna, Italy
关键词
R&D; Real options; Capital budgeting; Debt financing constraint; FINANCING CONSTRAINTS; REAL OPTIONS; AGENCY COSTS; DEBT; INNOVATION; FIRM; UNCERTAINTY; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-019-00807-6
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the interaction between R&D investment timing, probability of default, and capital structure. In particular we are interested in studying the investment behaviour of three different types of firms according to their capital structure: firms that only use internal funds as a source of funding (unlevered), firms that use debt and that are able to attract unlimited amount of funds (levered unconstrained) and finally firms that use debt, but are not able to attract all the amount needed (levered constrained). We consider irreversible investments in R&D with uncertain returns, financed through debt. We show that debt financing (with or without constraints) significantly alters the standard results in the real option literature. First, we show that leverage distorts the investment threshold and shareholders of a levered firm tend to accelerate investment with respect to an all equity financed firm. This finding is explained by the fact that the increase in the probability of default, which is positively correlated with leverage, might induce a potential loss of the investment option and thus reduce the value of the option to wait providing equity holders with an incentive to speed up the investment. Second, if we introduce the financial constraint, the investment threshold is characterized by a U-shaped relation. The latter implies that the investment threshold diminishes as the financial constraint becomes less stringent, but up to a certain minimum value. After a certain amount of leverage the firm attitude towards R&D investment changes. The firm becomes more risk adverse, given the much higher probability of default (linked to a much higher leverage in its balance sheet).
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 801
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interest rates, R&D investment and the distortionary effects of R&D incentives
    Aysun, Uluc
    Kabukcuoglu, Zeynep
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 111 : 191 - 210
  • [42] R&D Investment and Performance in Korea: Korean R&D Scoreboard 2005
    Cho, Seong-Pyo
    Lim, Kichul
    Kwon, Gee-Jung
    Sung, Yo-Hun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2008, 16 (01) : 143 - 160
  • [43] The cyclicality of R&D investment revisited
    van Ophem, Hans
    van Giersbergen, Noud
    van Garderen, Kees Jan
    Bun, Maurice
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2019, 34 (02) : 315 - 324
  • [44] Contract enforcement and R&D investment
    Seitz, Michael
    Watzinger, Martin
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (01) : 182 - 195
  • [45] Dynamical model of R&D investment
    2001, Nauka Moscow (65):
  • [46] Herron boosts R&D investment
    不详
    AUSTRALASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 11 (06) : 15 - 15
  • [47] Relocation and investment in R&D by firms
    Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz
    María Begoña Garzón
    Portuguese Economic Journal, 2014, 13 : 25 - 38
  • [48] R&D, investment, and industry dynamics
    Lach, S
    Rob, R
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1996, 5 (02) : 217 - 249
  • [49] Investigating investment in biopharmaceutical R&D
    Carter, Percy H.
    Berndt, Ernst R.
    DiMasi, Joseph A.
    Trusheim, Mark
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2016, 15 (10) : 673 - 674
  • [50] Knowledge sharing and R&D investment
    Sarkar, Abhirup
    ECONOPHYSICS OF MARKETS AND BUSINESS NETWORKS, 2007, : 227 - 232