Focusing biodiversity research on the needs of decision makers

被引:10
|
作者
Smythe, KD [1 ]
Bernabo, JC [1 ]
Carter, TB [1 ]
Jutro, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, WASHINGTON, DC 20460 USA
关键词
biodiversity; ecosystem management; ecological stewardship; sustainable development; assessment;
D O I
10.1007/BF01205966
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The project on Biodiversity Uncertainties and Research Needs (BURN) ensures the advancement of usable knowledge on biodiversity by obtaining input from decision makers on their priority information needs about biodiversity and then using this input to engage leading scientists in designing policy-relevant research. Decision makers articulated concerns related to four issues: significance of biodiversity; status and trends of biodiversity; management for biodiversity; and the linkage of social, cultural, economic, legal, and biological objectives. Leading natural and social scientists then identified the research required to address the decision makers' needs and determined the probability of success. The diverse group of experts reached consensus on several fundamental issues, helping to clarify the role of biodiversity in land and resource management. The BURN participants identified several features that should be incorporated into policy-relevant research plans and management strategies for biodiversity. Research and assessment efforts should be: multidisciplinary and integrative, participatory with stakeholder involvement, hierarchical (multiple scales), and problem- and region-specific. The activities should be focused regionally within a global perspective. Meta-analysis of existing data is needed on ail fronts to assess the slate of the science. More specifically, the scientists recommended six priority research areas that should be pursued to address the information needs articulated by decision makers: (1) characterization of biodiversity, (2) environmental valuation, (3) management for sustainability-for humans and the environment (adaptive management), (4) information management strategies, (5) governance and stewardship issues, and (6) communication and outreach. Broad recommendations were developed for each research area to provide direction for research planning and resource management strategies. The results wilt directly benefit those groups that require biodiversity research to address their needs-whether to develop policy, manage natural resources, or make other decisions affecting biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 872
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Supporting the needs of public health decision-makers and review authors in the UK
    Francis, Daniel
    Turley, Ruth
    Thomson, Hilary
    Weightman, Alison
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Moore, Laurence
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 37 (01) : 172 - 174
  • [32] DECISION MAKERS PERSPECTIVE ON HOW ACCOUNTING SYSTEM CAN MEET USER NEEDS
    PAKRUL, HA
    COST AND MANAGEMENT, 1977, 51 (05): : 12 - 19
  • [33] NURSING-HOME DECISION MAKERS AND SOCIAL-SERVICE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS
    AUSTIN, MJ
    KOSBERG, JI
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 1976, 1 (04) : 447 - 455
  • [34] THE DECISION MAKERS
    PRESSMAN, I
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1990, 11 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [35] Eco-informatics for decision makers advancing a research agenda
    Cushing, JB
    Wilson, T
    DATA INTEGRATION IN THE LIFE SCIENCES, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3615 : 325 - 334
  • [36] UNDERUTILIZED RESEARCH - RESEARCHERS AND DECISION MAKERS CONCEPTIONS OF INFORMATION QUALITY
    SEIDEL, AD
    KNOWLEDGE-CREATION DIFFUSION UTILIZATION, 1981, 3 (02): : 233 - 248
  • [37] CONNECTING WITH DECISION MAKERS: PRACTICAL TIPS FOR RESEARCH UNDERSTANDING AND USE
    MacPhail, Judith
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (05) : 469 - 470
  • [38] ENHANCING ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH UTILIZATION - THE ROLE OF DECISION MAKERS ASSUMPTIONS
    SHRIVASTAVA, P
    MITROFF, II
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (01): : 18 - 26
  • [39] RESEARCH ON THE CONFINEMENT AND TREATMENT OF UNFIT DEFENDANTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKERS
    ROESCH, R
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CRIMINOLOGIE, 1981, 23 (04): : 451 - 458
  • [40] Surrogate decision makers' attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients
    Barrett, Kali A.
    Ferguson, Niall D.
    Athaide, Valerie
    Cook, Deborah J.
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    McDonald, Ellen
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Smith, Orla M.
    Stevenson, James
    Scales, Damon C.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (10) : 1616 - 1623