Design and comparison of a hybrid to a traditional in-person point-of-care ultrasound course

被引:6
|
作者
Janjigian, Michael [1 ]
Dembitzer, Anne [2 ]
Srisarajivakul-Klein, Caroline [1 ]
Mednick, Aron [3 ]
Hardower, Khemraj [3 ]
Cooke, Deborah [3 ]
Zabar, Sondra [3 ]
Sauthoff, Harald [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Med, Grossman Sch Med, NYC Hlth & Hosp Bellevue,Bellevue Hosp Ctr, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Med, NY Harbor Healthcare Syst, Grossman Sch Med, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Dept Med, Grossman Sch Med, NYU Langone Hlth, New York, NY 10016 USA
来源
ULTRASOUND JOURNAL | 2022年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Point-of-care ultrasound; Medical education; Program assessment; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13089-022-00261-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional introductory point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) courses are resource intensive, typically requiring 2-3 days at a remote site, consisting of lectures and hands-on components. Social distancing requirements resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic led us to create a novel hybrid course curriculum consisting of virtual and inperson components. Methods: Faculty, chief residents, fellows and advanced practice providers (APPs) in the Department of Medicine were invited to participate in the hybrid curriculum. The course structure included 4 modules of recorded lectures, quizzes, online image interpretation sessions, online case discussions, and hands-on sessions at the bedside of course participant's patients. The components of the course were delivered over approximately 8 months. Those participants who completed a minimum of 3 modules over the year were invited for final assessments. Results from the hybrid curriculum cohort were compared to the year-end data from a prior traditional in-person cohort. Results: Participant knowledge scores were not different between traditional (n= 19) and hybrid (n = 24) groups (81% and 84%, respectively, P= 0.9). There was no change in POCUS skills as measured by the hands-on test from both groups at end-of-course (76% and 76%, respectively, P= 0.93). Confidence ratings were similar across groups from 2.73 traditional to 3.0 hybrid (out of possible 4, P= 0.46). Participants rated the course highly, with an average overall rating of 4.6 out 5. Conclusions: A hybrid virtual and in-person POCUS course was highly rated and as successful as a traditional course in improving learner knowledge, hands-on skill and confidence at 8 months after course initiation. These results support expanding virtual elements of POCUS educational curricula.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DESIGN AND COMPARISON OF A HYBRID TO A TRADITIONAL IN-PERSON POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND COURSE
    Janjigian, Michael
    Dembitzer, Anne
    Srisarajivakul-Klein, Caroline
    Mednick, Aron
    Hardower, Khemraj
    Cooke, Deborah
    Zabar, Sondra R.
    Sauthoff, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (SUPPL 2) : 207 - 208
  • [2] Design and comparison of a hybrid to a traditional in-person point-of-care ultrasound course
    Michael Janjigian
    Anne Dembitzer
    Caroline Srisarajivakul-Klein
    Aron Mednick
    Khemraj Hardower
    Deborah Cooke
    Sondra Zabar
    Harald Sauthoff
    [J]. The Ultrasound Journal, 14
  • [3] Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Nilam J. Soni
    Jeremy S. Boyd
    Gregory Mints
    Kevin C. Proud
    Trevor P. Jensen
    Gigi Liu
    Benji K. Mathews
    Christopher K. Schott
    Linda Kurian
    Charles M. LoPresti
    Phil Andrus
    Robert Nathanson
    Natalie Smith
    Elizabeth K. Haro
    Michael J. Mader
    Jacqueline Pugh
    Marcos I. Restrepo
    Brian P. Lucas
    [J]. The Ultrasound Journal, 13
  • [4] Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Soni, Nilam J.
    Boyd, Jeremy S.
    Mints, Gregory
    Proud, Kevin C.
    Jensen, Trevor P.
    Liu, Gigi
    Mathews, Benji K.
    Schott, Christopher K.
    Kurian, Linda
    LoPresti, Charles M.
    Andrus, Phil
    Nathanson, Robert
    Smith, Natalie
    Haro, Elizabeth K.
    Mader, Michael J.
    Pugh, Jacqueline
    Restrepo, Marcos, I
    Lucas, Brian P.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND JOURNAL, 2021, 13 (01):
  • [5] Comparison of Virtual Management of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis to Traditional In-Person Care
    Murray, Martha A.
    Penza, Kristine L. L.
    Furst, Joseph W. W.
    Pecina, Jennifer L. L.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2023, 29 (05) : 738 - 743
  • [6] Online vs in-person musculoskeletal ultrasound course: a cohort comparison study
    Lake, Shirley
    Brydges, Ryan
    Penney, Chris
    Wilson, Diane
    Sweezie, Raquel
    Bagovich, Maria
    Bong, David
    Barr, Susan
    Stroud, Lynfa
    [J]. ULTRASOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 16 (01):
  • [7] Interactive Online Lung Point-of-Care Ultrasound Course
    Guttman, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 76 (04) : S95 - S95
  • [8] Point-of-Care Ultrasound
    Linda Lee
    Jeanne M. DeCara
    [J]. Current Cardiology Reports, 2020, 22
  • [9] Point-of-Care Ultrasound
    Lee, Linda
    DeCara, Jeanne M.
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 22 (11)
  • [10] Point-of-care ultrasound: Compression ultrasound
    Krehl, Julian
    Kanne, Christian
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2022, 25 (05): : 355 - 358