Online vs in-person musculoskeletal ultrasound course: a cohort comparison study

被引:0
|
作者
Lake, Shirley [1 ]
Brydges, Ryan [2 ]
Penney, Chris [3 ]
Wilson, Diane [4 ]
Sweezie, Raquel [4 ]
Bagovich, Maria [1 ]
Bong, David [5 ]
Barr, Susan [3 ]
Stroud, Lynfa [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Rheumatol, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Unity Hlth Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Div Rheumatol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Barcelona, Sch Med, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
ULTRASOUND JOURNAL | 2024年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
Musculoskeletal ultrasound online education; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1186/s13089-024-00375-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Point-of-care musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) courses are typically held in-person. The COVID-19 pandemic guidelines forced courses to switch to online delivery. To determine this impact, we conducted an observational cohort study, comparing homework completion and image quality between an Online and a historical In-person cohort. Methods The In-person (n = 27) and Online (n = 24) cohorts attended two learning sessions spaced six months apart. The course content was the same, while the process of delivery differed. As homework, participants submitted US images biweekly for up to five months after each session. Expert faculty provided written feedback to all participants, and two independent reviewers rated the image quality for a subset of participants in each group who had completed at least 70% of their homework (In-person, n = 9; Online, n = 9). Participants self-reported their satisfaction through post-course evaluation. Results 63% of In-Person and 71% of Online cohort participants submitted their homework images. We observed no differences in the mean amount of homework images submitted for In-person (M = 37.3%, SD = 42.6%) and Online cohorts (M = 48.1%, SD = 38.8%; p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney U Test). At course end, the cohorts did not differ in overall image quality (p > 0.05, Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test). All participants reported high levels of satisfaction. Conclusions A convenience sample of participants attending a basic MSK US course in-person and online did not differ statistically in homework completion, quality of submitted US images, or course satisfaction. We add to literature suggesting online learning remains a viable option post-pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observational Cohort Study of an Online Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course
    Lake, Shirley
    Stroud, Lynfa
    Penney, Christopher
    Wilson, Diane
    Bagovich, Maria
    Bong, David
    Barr, Susan
    Brydges, Ryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 49 (07) : 806 - 806
  • [2] In-person Vs Online/hybrid Course Format On Sedentary Time In College Students
    Rankin, Erin
    DeShaw, Kathryn
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2023, 55 (09) : 901 - 902
  • [3] Continued professional development: A comparison of online vs. in-person workshops
    Gallegos, Patrick J.
    Mistry, Bhavin
    Freshwater, Dustin
    Mullen, Chanda
    [J]. CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2021, 13 (07) : 770 - 775
  • [4] Design and comparison of a hybrid to a traditional in-person point-of-care ultrasound course
    Janjigian, Michael
    Dembitzer, Anne
    Srisarajivakul-Klein, Caroline
    Mednick, Aron
    Hardower, Khemraj
    Cooke, Deborah
    Zabar, Sondra
    Sauthoff, Harald
    [J]. ULTRASOUND JOURNAL, 2022, 14 (01):
  • [5] DESIGN AND COMPARISON OF A HYBRID TO A TRADITIONAL IN-PERSON POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND COURSE
    Janjigian, Michael
    Dembitzer, Anne
    Srisarajivakul-Klein, Caroline
    Mednick, Aron
    Hardower, Khemraj
    Cooke, Deborah
    Zabar, Sondra R.
    Sauthoff, Harald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (SUPPL 2) : 207 - 208
  • [6] Design and comparison of a hybrid to a traditional in-person point-of-care ultrasound course
    Michael Janjigian
    Anne Dembitzer
    Caroline Srisarajivakul-Klein
    Aron Mednick
    Khemraj Hardower
    Deborah Cooke
    Sondra Zabar
    Harald Sauthoff
    [J]. The Ultrasound Journal, 14
  • [7] Comparison Between Online and In-person Instruction in a Laboratory-based Animal Science Course
    McCurdy, Dana E.
    Miller-Kleman, Richelle
    High, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 216 - 216
  • [8] A comparative study between outcomes of an in-person versus online introductory field course
    Race, Alexandra I.
    De Jesus, Maria
    Beltran, Roxanne S.
    Zavaleta, Erika S.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (08): : 3625 - 3635
  • [9] Online vs in-person delivery of preclinical coursework: A retrospective cohort study evaluating National Board of Chiropractic Examiners performance
    Anderson, Brian R.
    Derby, Dustin C.
    Percuoco, Robert E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [10] The RISE FOR HEALTH study: Methods for in-person musculoskeletal assessment
    Fitzgerald, Colleen M.
    Fok, Cynthia
    Kenton, Kim
    Lukacz, Emily
    Markland, Alayne D.
    Meister, Melanie
    Newman, Diane K.
    Rudser, Kyle
    Smith, Elia G.
    Wyman, Jean F.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2023, 42 (05) : 1022 - 1035