Examining the validity and reliability of the Taita symptom checklist using Rasch analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Yun-Ling [1 ]
Pan, Ay-Woan [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Lyinn [3 ]
Chen, Tsyr-Jang [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Stat, San Shia, Taiwan
[4] Lung Hwa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Gueishan, Taiwan
关键词
mental disorders; psychiatric status rating scales; psychometrics; Rasch analysis; Taita symptom checklist; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; ACUTE PSYCHIATRIC-INPATIENTS; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; DEPRESSION SCALE; OLDER-PEOPLE; MODEL; VALIDATION; POPULATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfma.2013.10.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The Taita symptom checklist (TSCL) is a standardized self- rating psychiatric symptom scale for outpatients with mental illness in Taiwan. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the TSCL using Rasch analysis. Methods: The TSCL was given to 583 healthy people and 479 people with mental illness. Rasch analysis was used to examine the appropriateness of the rating scale, the unidimensionality of the scale, the differential item functioning across sex and diagnosis, and the Rasch cut-off score of the scale. Results: Rasch analysis confirmed that the revised 37 items with a three-point rating scale of the TSCL demonstrated good internal consistency and met criteria for unidimensionality. The person and item reliability indices were high. The TSCL could reliably measure healthy participants and patients with mental illness. Differential item functioning due to sex or psychiatric diagnosis was evident for three items. A Rasch cut-off score for TSCL was produced for detecting participants' psychiatric symptoms based on an eight-level classification. Conclusion: The TSCL is a reliable and valid assessment to evaluate the participants' perceived disturbance of psychiatric symptoms based on Rasch analysis. Copyright (C) 2013, Elsevier Taiwan LLC & Formosan Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 230
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study
    Ozel Asliyuce, Yasemin
    Gokmen, Derya
    Ulger, Ozlem
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (06) : 1760 - 1765
  • [42] Measuring Reliability and Validity of Questionnaire on Online Social Presence: A Rasch Model Analysis
    Lah, Noor Hidayah Che
    Tasir, Zaidatun
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (11) : 7900 - 7903
  • [43] The Toileting Habit Profile Questionnaire (THPQ): Examining Construct Validity Using the Rasch Model
    Beaudry-Bellefeuille, Isabelle
    Lane, Shelly
    Bundy, Anita
    Lane, Alison
    Ramos-Polo, Eduardo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 73 (04):
  • [44] The Elderly Lifestyle Profile Questionnaire: Examining Construct Validity Using the Rasch Measurement Model
    Park, Kanghyun
    Park, Ji-Hyuk
    Hong, Ickpyo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 75
  • [45] Using the Rasch measurement theory to assess the psychometric properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 in adolescents
    Hanne Søberg Finbråten
    Annette Løvheim Kleppang
    Anne Mari Steigen
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [46] Using the Rasch measurement theory to assess the psychometric properties of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10 in adolescents
    Finbraten, Hanne Soberg
    Kleppang, Annette Lovheim
    Steigen, Anne Mari
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [47] The clinical validity of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist: a systematic review
    Carrozzino, Danilo
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2019, 88 : 21 - 21
  • [48] Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach
    Cordier, Reinie
    Speyer, Renee
    Schindler, Antonio
    Michou, Emilia
    Heijnen, Bas Joris
    Baijens, Laura
    Karaduman, Ayse
    Swan, Katina
    Clave, Pere
    Joosten, Annette Veronica
    [J]. DYSPHAGIA, 2018, 33 (04) : 441 - 456
  • [49] Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach
    Reinie Cordier
    Renée Speyer
    Antonio Schindler
    Emilia Michou
    Bas Joris Heijnen
    Laura Baijens
    Ayşe Karaduman
    Katina Swan
    Pere Clavé
    Annette Veronica Joosten
    [J]. Dysphagia, 2018, 33 : 441 - 456
  • [50] Reliability and concurrent validity of the Ccomputer Workstation Checklist
    Baker, Nancy A.
    Livengood, Heather
    Jacobs, Karen
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2013, 45 (02): : 213 - 221