Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital

被引:274
|
作者
Maak, Thomas
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Inst Business Eth, CH-9010 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
关键词
responsible leadership; social capital; stakeholder relationships; leadership ethics;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I argue in this article that responsible leadership (Maak and Pless, 2006) contributes to building social capital and ultimately to both a sustainable business and the common good. I show, first, that responsible leadership in a global stakeholder society is a relational and inherently moral phenomenon that cannot be captured in traditional dyadic leader-follower relationships (e.g., to subordinates) or by simply focusing on questions of leadership effectiveness. Business leaders have to deal with moral complexity resulting from a multitude of stakeholder claims and have to build enduring and mutually beneficial relationships with all relevant stakeholders. I contend, second, that in doing so leaders bundle the energy of different constituencies and enable social capital building. Social capital can be understood as actual or potential resources inherent to more or less institutionalized relationships of mutual recognition (Bourdieu 1980). By drawing on network analysis I suggest, third, that responsible leaders weave durable relational structures and ultimately networks of relationships which are rich in ties to otherwise unconnected individuals or groups. Against this background I argue, fourth, that responsible leadership may result in the creation of value networks (Lord and Brown, 2001) of multiple stakeholders, which enhance social capital and thereby contribute to both a sustainable business and the common good.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 343
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stakeholder Prioritization for the Construction of Organizational Social Capital
    Baro, Marcelo
    [J]. MEDIACIONES SOCIALES, 2011, (09): : 135 - 162
  • [22] Enhancing social capital in our stakeholder networks
    Dunne, Mary
    [J]. INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL, 2020, 33
  • [23] Social media is essential for research engagement: FOR: Facilitating stakeholder engagement is key!
    Brown, Hannah M.
    Cruz, Melinda
    Mol, Ben W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (06) : 902 - 902
  • [24] Stakeholder power and engagement in an English seaside context: implications for destination leadership
    Kennedy, Victoria
    Augustyn, Marcjanna M.
    [J]. TOURISM REVIEW, 2014, 69 (03) : 187 - 201
  • [25] An Approach for Humanizing Leadership Education: Building Learning Community & Stakeholder Engagement
    Khilji, Shaista E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2022, 46 (03) : 439 - 471
  • [26] Stakeholder engagement and corporate social reputation: The influence of exogenous factors on efficiency performance (stakeholder engagement and exogenous factors)
    Solana-Ibanez, Jose
    Caravaca-Garraton, Manuel
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (06) : 1891 - 1905
  • [27] Responsible tourist behaviour: The role of social engagement
    Diallo, Mbaye Fall
    Diop-Sall, Fatou
    Leroux, Erick
    Valette-Florence, Pierre
    [J]. RECHERCHE ET APPLICATIONS EN MARKETING-ENGLISH EDITION, 2015, 30 (03): : 85 - 104
  • [28] Corporate Social Strategy: Stakeholder Engagement and Competitive Advantage
    Perezts, Mar
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 29 (06) : 514 - 515
  • [29] Stakeholder engagement in the design of EHR tools for social care
    Pisciotta, Maura
    Gunn, Rose
    Gold, Rachel
    Cottrell, Erika
    Middendorf, Mary
    Hessler, Danielle
    Bunce, Arwen
    Gottlieb, Laura
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18
  • [30] Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective
    Zou, Jie
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2015, 9 (03) : 371 - 399