DNA-PK-independent rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cell extracts in vitro

被引:27
|
作者
Cheong, N [1 ]
Perrault, AR [1 ]
Wang, H [1 ]
Wachberger, P [1 ]
Mammen, P [1 ]
Jackson, I [1 ]
Iliakis, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/095530099140825
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the role of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in the rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (dsb). Materials and methods: This study employed previously described in vitro assays that utilize nuclei or 'naked' DNA prepared from agarose-embedded cells as a substrate and S-HeLa cell extracts as a source of enzymes. Rejoining of dsb in these assays is absolutely dependent on cell extract and it proceeds, under optimal reaction conditions, to an extent similar to that observed in intact cells. Results were confirmed in a plasmid-based assay for in vitro rejoining of dsb. Results: It is shown that concentrations of wortmannin completely inhibiting DNA-PK activity profoundly affect the rejoining df dsb in vivo, but have no effect on dsb rejoining in vitro. Furthermore, fractionation of cell extracts using ammonium sulphate precipitation, generates protein fractions that are able to support dsb rejoining, despite the fact that they do not contain detectable amounts of either DNA-PKcs or Ku80. Efficient rejoining of dsb in vitro is also observed with extracts of MO59J cells that lack DNA-PK activity. Finally, rejoining of dsb remains unaffected by wortmannin in a plasmid-based assay, and is also detectable with extracts of MO59J cells. Conclusions: These findings are in contrast with genetic studies demonstrating a requirement for DNA-PK activity for efficient rejoining of dsb in vivo. The difference between in vitro and in vivo results may not be attributed to chromatin structure since wortmannin was without an effect when using nuclei as a substrate. It is speculated that the differences between in vivo and in vitro results can be explained either by assuming the operation of multiple pathways in dsb rejoining, some of which do not require DNA-PK, or by postulating a purely regulatory/damage sensing role for DNA-PK in intact cells but no direct involvement in dsb rejoining.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in cho cells after heavy ion irradiation
    Taucher-Scholz, G.
    Heilmann, J.
    Kraft, G.
    Advances in Space Research, 18 (1-2): : 83 - 92
  • [43] In vitro rejoining of double strand breaks induced in cellular DNA by bleomycin and restriction endonucleases
    Cheong, N
    Iliakis, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 71 (04) : 365 - 375
  • [44] Chromatin Remodeling at DNA Double-Strand Breaks
    Price, Brendan D.
    D'Andrea, Alan D.
    CELL, 2013, 152 (06) : 1344 - 1354
  • [45] Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks
    Waterman, David P.
    Haber, James E.
    Smolka, Marcus B.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 89, 2020, 89 : 103 - 133
  • [47] DNA Double-Strand Breaks Come into Focus
    Hopfner, Karl-Peter
    CELL, 2009, 139 (01) : 25 - 27
  • [48] REPAIR OF DOUBLE-STRAND DNA BREAKS IN DROSOPHILA
    DEZZANI, W
    HARRIS, PV
    BOYD, JB
    MUTATION RESEARCH, 1982, 92 (1-2): : 151 - 160
  • [49] DNA double-strand breaks and cellular senescence
    Sedelnikova, OA
    Horikawa, I
    Filipski, MJ
    Redon, CE
    Pilch, DR
    Newrock, KM
    Bonner, WM
    Barrett, JC
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2002, 13 : 441A - 441A
  • [50] Regulation and repair of double-strand DNA breaks
    Weaver, DT
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN EUKARYOTIC GENE EXPRESSION, 1996, 6 (04): : 345 - 375