Anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash [1 ]
Bijukchhe, Sanjeev Man [2 ]
Reduwan, Nor Hidayah [3 ]
机构
[1] Walailak Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Int Coll Dent, Thai Buri, Thailand
[2] Patan Acad Hlth Sci, Dept Paediat, Patan, Nepal
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Ctr Oral & Maxillofacial Diagnost & Med Studies, Fac Dent, Sungai Buloh Campus, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2020年 / 51卷 / 07期
关键词
bupivacaine; local anesthesia; mandibular third molar surgery; systematic review; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; DOUBLE-BLIND; LIDOCAINE; ARTICAINE;
D O I
10.3290/j.qi.a44633
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective:This study was conducted to compare the anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine with other local anesthetic agents routinely used for mandibular third molar surgery. Method and materials: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were explored to isolate randomized controlled trials up to 10 February 2019. The anesthetic and analgesic efficacies were assessed using six evaluation outcomes: onset of anesthesia, success of anesthesia, duration of anesthesia, duration of analgesia, pain score on the fourth postoperative hour, and number of analgesics consumed. Stata software (version 13, StataCorp) was used to analyze the data. Results: Fourteen studies met the specified criteria. The sample consisted of 1,078 mandibular third molar surgeries performed in 858 patients. Bupivacaine, lidocaine/lignocaine, articaine, etidocaine, levobupivacaine, and carbonated bupivacaine were the local anesthetics used. Compared with other anesthetic agents, bupivacaine showed longer duration of anesthesia (weighted mean difference [WMD] 123.431 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] 34.01 to 212.851; P = .007), lower pain score at the fourth and eighth postoperative hours (4 hr-WMD 2.757; 95% CI 0.893 to 4.62; P = .004; 8 hr-WMD 1.697; 95% CI 1.178 to 2.216; P < .001), and lower number of analgesics requirement (WMD 0.663; 95% CI 0.258 to 1.067; P = .001). The onset of anesthesia was slower for bupivacaine (WMD 0.865 minutes; 95% CI 0.799 to 0.931; P < .001). However, for success of anesthesia (risk ratio 1.003; 95% CI 0.972 to 1.035; P = .831) and duration of analgesia (WMD 45.285 minutes; 95% Cl 48.021 to 138.537; P = .342), the local anesthetic agents showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Except for the onset of anesthesia, bupivacaine showed better anesthetic and analgesic properties than other local anesthetic agents for mandibular third molar surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 597
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does kinesio taping reduce pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Firoozi, Parsa
    Fonseca Souza, Marina Rocha
    de Souza, Glaciele Maria
    Fernandes, Ighor Andrade
    Galvao, Endi Lanza
    Moreira Falci, Saulo Gabriel
    [J]. ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 26 (04): : 535 - 553
  • [32] Oral Bromelain for the Control of Facial Swelling, Trismus, and Pain After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Shaopeng
    Zhao, Haoming
    Wang, Ye
    Zhao, Huaqiang
    Ma, Chuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (08) : 1566 - 1574
  • [33] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Envelope and Triangular Flaps After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Junfei
    Yuan, Xuguang
    Yan, LiE
    Li, Tianzhu
    Guang, Mengkai
    Zhang, Ye
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (04) : 515 - 527
  • [34] Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for pain control in shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yujia
    Shen, Zhien
    Wang, Hongmei
    Feng, Tonghui
    Xia, Yanfei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (09) : 1957 - 1968
  • [35] Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Carter, K.
    Worthington, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [36] Application of concentrated growth factor in mandibular third molar extraction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hengxiao
    Dong, Jianyong
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Sun, Xiaodong
    Wang, Jin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05): : e0302581
  • [37] Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Postoperative Infections in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lupi, Saturnino Marco
    Olivieri, Giorgia
    Landini, Jessica
    Ferrigno, Andrea
    Richelmi, Plinio
    Todaro, Claudia
    Baena, Ruggero
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (20):
  • [38] Anesthetic and analgesic methods for gynecologic brachytherapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Petitt, Matthew S.
    Ackerman, Robert S.
    Hanna, Mark M.
    Chen, Liwei
    Mhaskar, Rahul S.
    Fernandez, Daniel C.
    Patel, Sephalie Y.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2020, 19 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [39] Efficacy of corticosteroids versus placebo in impacted third molar surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Almeida, R. de A. C.
    Lemos, C. A. A.
    de Moraes, S. L. D.
    Pellizzer, E. P.
    Vasconcelos, B. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) : 118 - 131
  • [40] The efficacy of methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone in reducing postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Madhoon, Hossam Waleed
    Al-Kafarna, Mohammed
    Ayyad, Nirmeen Jehad
    Gbreel, Mohamed Ibrahim
    Zaazouee, Mohamed Sayed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04) : 365 - 374