Effects of treatment with eluxadoline on abdominal pain in patients with IBS-D: Additional post hoc analyses of Phase 3 trials

被引:6
|
作者
Lembo, Anthony J. [1 ]
Covington, Paul S. [2 ]
Dove, Leonard S. [3 ]
Andrae, David A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Furiex Pharmaceut Inc, Madison, NJ USA
[3] Allergan Plc, Madison, NJ USA
来源
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY | 2020年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
abdominal pain; diarrhea; eluxadoline; irritable bowel syndrome; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; LINACLOTIDE; PREVALENCE; SEVERITY; EFFICACY; EVALUATE;
D O I
10.1111/nmo.13774
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurring abdominal pain is a characteristic and often unpredictable and debilitating symptom of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). Measuring the effects of IBS-D treatments on abdominal pain remains a significant challenge in clinical trials. Here, we aimed to examine the effect of eluxadoline through various post hoc analyses. Methods Data from two eluxadoline Phase 3 trials were pooled over 26 weeks, comparing eluxadoline 100 mg twice daily to placebo. Worst abdominal pain (WAP) was measured daily on a 0-10 scale. WAP responder criteria were prospectively defined as a >= 30% improvement in daily WAP score on >= 50% of days. Pairwise, two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests assessed treatment effects. Cumulative distribution functions were used to plot WAP response rates using variations on the response criteria. Key results Of 1615 patients with IBS-D (66% female, mean age 46 years), 806 received eluxadoline and 809 received placebo; 48.3% and 44.0% were WAP responders (>= 30% improvement), respectively (P value not significant). When the response threshold was increased to 50% daily WAP improvement from baseline, a significantly greater percentage of eluxadoline-treated patients versus placebo-treated patients were WAP responders (38.7% vs 32.5%, respectively; P = .009). At Week 26, average WAP changes from baseline were -3.4 and -3.0 points, respectively (P = .002). Conclusions and Inferences Despite small effect sizes, eluxadoline demonstrated consistent and sustained improvement in WAP compared to placebo across a range of prospective and post hoc analyses. Assessing WAP response across a range of measures is important for fully understanding a treatment's efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical meaningfulness of duloxetine's effect in Chinese patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis: post hoc analyses of a phase 3 randomized trial
    Yue, Li
    Luo, Sheng
    Wang, Yiwen
    Wang, Chia-Ning
    Duenas, Hector Jose
    Skijarevski, Vladimir
    [J]. OPEN ACCESS RHEUMATOLOGY-RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 11 : 67 - 76
  • [42] The effect of linaclotide treatment on abdominal and bowel symptom measures in patients with chronic constipation and abdominal pain: pooled results from two phase 3 trials
    Lembo, A. J.
    Schneier, H. A.
    Lavins, B. J.
    Shiff, S. J.
    Hao, X.
    Jia, X. D.
    Johnston, J. M.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2011, 23 : 38 - 38
  • [43] Momelotinib in Myelofibrosis Patients With Thrombocytopenia: Post Hoc Analysis From Three Randomized Phase 3 Trials
    Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques
    Vannucchi, Alessandro M.
    Gerds, Aaron T.
    Gupta, Vikas
    Verstovsek, Srdan
    Egyed, Miklos
    Platzbecker, Uwe
    Mayer, Jiri
    Grosicki, Sebastian
    Illes, Arpad
    Wozny, Tomasz
    Oh, Stephen T.
    McLornan, Donal
    Kirgner, Ilya
    Yoon, Sung-Soo
    Harrison, Claire N.
    Klencke, Barbara
    Huang, Mei
    Kawashima, Jun
    Mesa, Ruben
    [J]. HEMASPHERE, 2023, 7 (11): : E963
  • [44] SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED ABDOMINAL PAIN (AP) WITH LINACLOTIDE (LIN) VS PLACEBO (PBO) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME (IBS) REGARDLESS OF BASELINE PAIN SEVERITY IN 2 PHASE 3 TRIALS
    Johnston, J.
    Chey, W. D.
    Lavins, B.
    Shiff, S. J.
    Kurtz, C.
    MacDougall, J.
    Jia, X.
    Schneier, H.
    Currie, M.
    [J]. GUT, 2013, 62 : A141 - A142
  • [45] Effects of metformin on disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: post hoc analyses from two randomised trials
    Sun, Fangfang
    Geng, Shikai
    Wang, Haiting
    Wang, Huijing
    Liu, Zhe
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Li, Ting
    Wan, Weiguo
    Lu, Liangjing
    Teng, Xiangyu
    Morel, Laurence
    Ye, Shuang
    [J]. LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [46] Baseline Anemia As a Predictor of Radiographic Progression in Tofacitinib-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Post Hoc Analyses from Two Phase 3 Trials
    Moeller, Burkhard
    Finckh, Axel
    Scholz, Godehard
    Shi, Harry
    Connell, Carol A.
    Strengholt, Sander
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [47] Early and sustained improvement with vilazodone in adult patients with major depressive disorder: post hoc analyses of two phase III trials
    Jain, Rakesh
    Chen, Dalei
    Edwards, John
    Mathews, Maju
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (02) : 263 - 270
  • [48] Upadacitinib Induction and Maintenance Therapy Improves Abdominal Pain, Bowel Urgency, and Fatigue in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Data
    Danese, Silvio
    Tran, Jacinda
    D'Haens, Geert
    Rubin, David T.
    Aoyama, Nobuo
    Zhou, Wen
    Ilo, Dapo
    Yao, Xuan
    Sanchez Gonzalez, Yuri
    Panaccione, Remo
    [J]. INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2023, 29 (11) : 1723 - 1729
  • [49] Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated With Galcanezumab vs Placebo: Post Hoc Analyses From a Phase 3 Randomized Study in Patients With Episodic Cluster Headache
    Kudrow, David
    Andrews, J. Scott
    Rettiganti, Mallikarjuna
    Oakes, Tina
    Bardos, Jennifer
    Gaul, Charly
    Riesenberg, Robert
    Wenzel, Richard
    Kuruppu, Dulanji
    Martinez, James
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (10): : 2254 - 2264
  • [50] Age does not modify the effects of treatment on pain in patients with low back pain: Secondary analyses of randomized clinical trials
    Ferreira, M. L.
    Ferreira, P. H.
    Henschke, N.
    Kamper, S. J.
    Koes, B.
    Hayden, J. A.
    Maher, C. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 18 (07) : 932 - 938