4π Noncoplanar Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer: Potential to Improve Tumor Control and Late Toxicity

被引:62
|
作者
Rwigema, Jean-Claude M. [1 ]
Nguyen, Dan [1 ]
Heron, Dwight E. [2 ]
Chen, Allen M. [1 ]
Lee, Percy [1 ]
Wang, Pin-Chieh [1 ]
Vargo, John A. [2 ]
Low, Daniel A. [1 ]
Huq, M. Saiful [2 ]
Tenn, Stephen [1 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick [1 ]
Sheng, Ke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PREVIOUSLY-IRRADIATED HEAD; CAROTID BLOWOUT SYNDROME; LOCALLY RECURRENT HEAD; 2ND PRIMARY HEAD; PHASE-II; UNRESECTABLE HEAD; REIRRADIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the potential benefit of 4 pi radiation therapy in recurrent, locally advanced, or metastatic head-and-neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials: Twenty-seven patients with 29 tumors who were treated using SBRT were included. In recurrent disease (n=26), SBRT was delivered with a median 44 Gy (range, 35-44 Gy) in 5 fractions. Three patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma, metastatic breast cancer, and primary undifferentiated carcinoma received 35 Gy, 22.5 Gy, and 40 Gy in 5 fractions, respectively. Novel 4 pi treatment plans were created for each patient to meet the objective that 95% of the planning target volume was covered by 100% of the prescription dose. Doses to organs at risk (OARs) and 50% dose spillage volumes were compared against the delivered clinical SBRT plans. Local control (LC), late toxicity, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability were determined. Results: Using 4 pi plans, mean/maximum doses to all OARs were reduced by 22% to 89%/10% to 86%. With 4 pi plans, the 50% dose spillage volume was decreased by 33%. Planning target volume prescription dose escalation by 10 Gy and 20 Gy were achieved while keeping doses to OARs significantly improved or unchanged from clinical plans, except for the carotid artery maximum dose at 20-Gy escalation. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 1-41 months), crude LC was 52%. The 2-year LC of 39.2% approximated the predicted mean TCP of 42.2%, which increased to 45.9% with 4 pi plans. For 10-Gy and 20-Gy dose escalation, 4 pi plans increased TCP from 80.1% and 88.1% to 85.5% and 91.4%, respectively. The 7.4% rate of grade > 3 late toxicity was comparable to the predicted 5.6% mean normal tissue complication probability for OARs, which was significantly reduced by 4 pi planning at the prescribed and escalated doses. Conclusions: 4 pi plans may allow dose escalation with significant and consistent improvements in critical organ sparing, tumor control, and coverage. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 409
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 4π Non-Coplanar Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Head and Neck Cancer: Potential to Improve Local Control and Late Toxicity
    Rwigema, J.
    Nguyen, D.
    Heron, D.
    Chen, A. M.
    Lee, P.
    Vargo, J. A.
    Low, D.
    Huq, M.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Kupelian, P.
    Sheng, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S556 - S557
  • [2] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Tumor: Disease Control and Morbidity Outcomes
    Kodani, Naohiro
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Tsubokura, Takuji
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Kobayashi, Kana
    Nishimura, Takuya
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Ikeno, Hiroyasu
    Nishimura, Tsunehiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2011, 52 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [3] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer
    Ling, Diane C.
    Vargo, John A.
    Heron, Dwight E.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04): : 302 - 306
  • [4] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY FOR PRIMARY, RECURRENT, AND METASTATIC TUMORS IN THE HEAD-AND-NECK REGION
    Siddiqui, Farzan
    Patel, Mehul
    Khan, Mumtaz
    McLean, Scott
    Dragovic, Jadranka
    Jin, Jian-Yue
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Ryu, Samuel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (04): : 1047 - 1053
  • [5] Emerging applications of stereotactic body radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Siddiqui, Farzan
    Raben, David
    Lu, Jiade J.
    Grecula, John C.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Huang, Zhibin
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Teh, Bin S.
    Yao, Min
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (09) : 1429 - 1436
  • [6] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ± Cetuximab as Primary Treatment for Elderly Patients With Medically-Inoperable Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Vargo, J. A.
    Ferris, R. L.
    Clump, D. A.
    Burton, S.
    Heron, D. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 489 - 490
  • [7] LATE ESOPHAGEAL TOXICITY AFTER RADIATION THERAPY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER
    Chen, Allen M.
    Li, Bao-Qing
    Jennelle, Richard L. S.
    Lau, Derick H.
    Yang, Claus C.
    Courquin, Jean
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    Purdy, James A.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2010, 32 (02): : 178 - 183
  • [8] Reirradiation of head and neck cancer focusing on hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Hideya Yamazaki
    Naohiro Kodani
    Mikio Ogita
    Kengo Sato
    Kengo Himei
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 6
  • [9] Reirradiation of head and neck cancer focusing on hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Kodani, Naohiro
    Ogita, Mikio
    Sato, Kengo
    Himei, Kengo
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6
  • [10] Dose-Response Model for Severe Late Laryngeal Toxicity after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Previously Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer
    Ling, Diane
    Vargo, John
    Grimm, Rachel
    Gebhardt, Brian
    Clump, David
    Ferris, Robert
    Ohr, James
    Heron, Dwight
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (02): : E6 - E6