User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework

被引:26
|
作者
Yang, Rongbin [1 ]
Wibowo, Santoso [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaplan Business Sch, Adelaide Campus,1-68 Grenfell St, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Cent Queensland Univ, 120 Spencer St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
AI; Trust; User; Literature review; Comprehensive framework; CONSUMER TRUST; PERCEIVED RISK; CUSTOMER; DESIGN; TECHNOLOGIES; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; ACCEPTANCE; INTENTION; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00592-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides a systematic literature review of current studies between January 2015 and January 2022 on user trust in artificial intelligence (AI) that has been conducted from different perspectives. Such a review and analysis leads to the identification of the various components, influencing factors, and outcomes of users' trust in AI. Based on the findings, a comprehensive conceptual framework is proposed for a better understanding of users' trust in AI. This framework can further be tested and validated in various contexts for enhancing our knowledge of users' trust in AI. This study also provides potential future research avenues. From a practical perspective, it helps AI-supported service providers comprehend the concept of user trust from different perspectives. The findings highlight the importance of building trust based on different facets to facilitate positive cognitive, affective, and behavioral changes among the users.
引用
收藏
页码:2053 / 2077
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling user's trust in M-commerce acceptance: A conceptual framework in context of Pakistan
    Rind, M. Malook
    Koondhar, M. Yacipob
    Hyder, Mansoor
    Shah, Asadullah
    [J]. 2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE APPLICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ACSAT), 2015, : 165 - 170
  • [42] Understanding user trust in artificial intelligence-based educational systems: Evidence from China
    Qin, Fen
    Li, Kai
    Yan, Jianyuan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (05) : 1693 - 1710
  • [43] Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence
    Baek, Tae Hyun
    Kim, Minseong
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2023, 83
  • [44] SHOULD WE TRUST ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?
    Sutrop, Margit
    [J]. TRAMES-JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (04): : 499 - 522
  • [45] How Much to Trust Artificial Intelligence?
    Hurlburt, George
    [J]. IT PROFESSIONAL, 2017, 19 (04) : 7 - 11
  • [46] Trust in artificial intelligence for medical diagnoses
    Juravle, Georgiana
    Boudouraki, Andriana
    Terziyska, Miglena
    Rezlescu, Constantin
    [J]. REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 253 : 263 - 282
  • [47] Trust and Success of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
    Miklavcic, Jonas
    [J]. BOGOSLOVNI VESTNIK-THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY-EPHEMERIDES THEOLOGICAE, 2021, 81 (04): : 935 - 946
  • [48] Zero-Trust Artificial Intelligence?
    Laplante, Phil
    Voas, Jeffrey
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2022, 55 (02) : 10 - 12
  • [49] A conceptual framework for clinicians working with artificial intelligence and health-assistive Smart Homes
    Dermody, Gordana
    Fritz, Roschelle
    [J]. NURSING INQUIRY, 2019, 26 (01)
  • [50] Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems
    Schmidt, Philipp
    Biessmann, Felix
    Teubner, Timm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2020, 29 (04) : 260 - 278