Experimental characterization of jet fuels under engine relevant conditions-Part 1: Effect of chemical composition on autoignition of conventional and alternative jet fuels

被引:31
|
作者
Kang, Dongil [1 ]
Kim, Doohyun [2 ]
Kalaskar, Vickey [3 ]
Violi, Angela [1 ,4 ]
Boehman, Andre L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Chem Engn, 2300 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Hongik Univ, Dept Mech & Syst Design Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, EMS Energy Inst, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, 2350 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Alternative jet aviation fuel; Motored engine; Ignition behavior; Surrogate; Constant volume combustion chamber; CHARGE COMPRESSION IGNITION; SHOCK-TUBE EXPERIMENTS; MOTORED ENGINE; AUTO-IGNITION; AVIATION FUEL; DELAY TIMES; COMBUSTION; KINETICS; MODEL; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.005
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Conventional and synthetic alternative jet fuels possess distinctive chemical compositions and physical/chemical properties since they are produced through different production processes. In this paper, the autoignition characteristics of four conventional aviation jet fuels (Jet-A POSF-4658, Jet-A POSF-10325, JP-5 POSF-10289, JP-8 POSE-6169), five alternative jet fuels (Syntroleum S-8 (S8), Shell synthetic paraffinic kerosene (Shell SPK), Sasol iso-paraffinic kerosene (Sasol IPK), hydro-processed renewable jet (HRJ8), alcohol to jet (ATJ), and 50/50 vol% blends of JP-8/alternative jet fuels were explored. The objective of the current work is to understand how the chemical composition of the fuels affects the gas phase chemical kinetic behavior and the ignition process of the liquid spray in an engine-relevant environment, thereby ultimately enabling their use in military ground vehicles with compression ignition engines. A modified Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR) motored engine was utilized and the gas phase ignition behavior was observed over a wide range of temperatures and pressures, while varying the compression ratio. In addition, an optically accessible constant volume spray combustion chamber was employed to observe significant differences in the global heat release characteristics and physical/chemical ignition delay times of synthetic alternative jet fuels in comparison to the conventional jet fuels. The results of this study show that synthetic alternative jet fuels with predominantly linear and lightly-branched alkane content (S8, Shell SPK and HRJ8) provide stronger low-temperature ignition characteristics, while other types of synthetic alternative jet fuels with high content of highly-branched alkanes (Sasol IPK and ATJ) exhibit weaker low-temperature ignition characteristics, when compared to conventional jet fuels (JP-8, Jet-A and JP-5). Their unique fundamental ignition behaviors, including the percentage of low-temperature heat release (% LTHR), the critical compression ratio (CCR), and the critical equivalence ratio (phi(cri)(t)), are strongly related to the dominant chemical compositions of the fuel in a motored engine.
引用
收藏
页码:1388 / 1404
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Experimental characterization of jet fuels under engine relevant conditions - Part 2: Insights on optimization approach for surrogate formulation
    Kang, Dongil
    Kim, Doohyun
    Kalaskar, Vickey
    Boehman, Andre
    Violi, Angela
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 239 : 1405 - 1416
  • [2] Evaluation of jet engine operation parameters using conventional and alternative jet fuels
    Yakovlieva, Anna
    Boichenko, Sergii
    Lejda, Kazimierz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AVIATION, 2019, 5 (03) : 230 - 248
  • [3] Chemical Composition and Fuel Properties of Alternative Jet Fuels
    Pires, Anamaria P. P.
    Han, Yinglei
    Kramlich, John
    Garcia-Perez, Manuel
    [J]. BIORESOURCES, 2018, 13 (02): : 2632 - 2657
  • [4] Autoignition behavior of synthetic alternative jet fuels: An examination of chemical composition effects on ignition delays at low to intermediate temperatures
    Valco, Daniel
    Gentz, Gerald
    Allen, Casey
    Colket, Meredith
    Edwards, Tim
    Gowdagiri, Sandeep
    Oehlschlaeger, Matthew A.
    Toulson, Elisa
    Lee, Tonghun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2015, 35 : 2983 - 2991
  • [5] A diesel engine study of conventional and alternative diesel and jet fuels: Ignition and emissions characteristics
    Gowdagiri, Sandeep
    Cesari, Xander M.
    Huang, Mingdi
    Oehlschlaeger, Matthew A.
    [J]. FUEL, 2014, 136 : 253 - 260
  • [6] Experimental investigation on spray characteristics of Jet A-1 and alternative aviation fuels
    Kumar, Manish
    Karmakar, Srinibas
    Kumar, Sonu
    Basu, Saptarshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPRAY AND COMBUSTION DYNAMICS, 2021, 13 (1-2) : 54 - 71
  • [7] Experimental Measurement of the Isothermal Bulk Modulus of Compressibility and Speed of Sound of Conventional and Alternative Jet Fuels
    Kim, Taemin
    Boehman, Andre L.
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 35 (17) : 13813 - 13829
  • [8] Combustion kinetics of alternative jet fuels, Part-I: Experimental flow reactor study
    Osswald, Patrick
    Zinsmeister, Julia
    Kathrotia, Trupti
    Alves-Fortunato, Maira
    Burger, Victor
    van der Westhuizen, Rina
    Viljoen, Carl
    Lehto, Kalle
    Sallinen, Reetu
    Sandberg, Kati
    Aigner, Manfred
    Le Clercq, Patrick
    Kohler, Markus
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 302
  • [9] Droplet vaporization for conventional and alternative jet fuels at realistic temperature conditions: Systematic measurements and numerical modeling
    Stoehr, Michael
    Ruoff, Stephan
    Rauch, Bastian
    Meier, Wolfgang
    Le Clercq, Patrick
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2021, 38 (02) : 3269 - 3276
  • [10] Macroscopic spray performance of alternative and conventional jet fuels at non-reacting, elevated ambient conditions
    Kannaiyan, Kumaran
    Sadr, Reza
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 266