PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE): CASE STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
Al Hazza, Muataz Hazza F. [1 ]
Ali, Mohammad Yeakub [2 ]
Razif, Nur Farahanis B. T. Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Ras Al Khaimah, Sch Engn, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, POB 10021, Ras Al Khaymah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Teknol Brunei, Fac Engn, Mech Engn Programme Area, Tungku Highway, BE-1410 Gadong, Brunei
[3] Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg & Mat Engn, POB 10, Kuala Lumpur 50728, Malaysia
来源
关键词
AHP; Manufacturing sector; OEE; Productivity; PRODUCTIVITY MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Improving productivity using an efficient measurement approach is essential for any manufacturer. One of the most used approaches that significantly value the current situation is overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) by intending to reduce breakdowns to increase the performance. Underutilized machinery, over-utilized machinery, and poor maintenance are leading to waste of the company's resources. In this case study, a comprehensive analysis has been conducted that never been done in the company to ensure a high utilization rate. It has been observed that some of the machines in the production line are idle and unused. The main objective of this research is to improve the productivity of one of the manufacturers of a concrete pole by determining the current Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) value of the most critical machines in the production line, analyse the causes of losses. To achieve the objective, the following three steps were conducted: (i) data collection and analysis, (ii) collection of in-depth information about the raw material and the production line using visual investigation, history, and (iii) in-depth interview with the key stakeholders in the company. A nine-metre concrete pole production line was selected to conduct the study. The research is focused on to identify the most critical machines on the production line. Those machines were selected by using multi-criteria decision-making method Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Three consecutive steps were conducted: computing the vector of criteria weights, computing the option scores' matrix, and ranking the options. Six alternatives were considered. In AHP calculations, four machines were selected to perform this study: top cage machine, wire cage machine, wire straightening machine, and concrete pump injection machine. Rank number one is the highest percentage of 32.9%, which is a frequent breakdown. The second highest rate is 29.4%, which is machine that are producing primary parts of the final product. The third-highest percentage is 22.4%, which are the machines that have historical production data. The OEE for the selected machines was conducted by calculating the quality level, performance, and availability. The result shows that the wire straightening machine's performance score was satisfactory with OEE of 85.17%. In contrast, the wire caging machine, top caging machine, and the concrete pump injection machine were found to have unsatisfactory OEE scores of 54.3%, 15.37%, and 68.84%, respectively. As a result, OEE can drive the company improvement by providing a better understanding of the losses that give a real metric to improve productivity and better utilization for the company resources.
引用
收藏
页码:2227 / 2244
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and the equipment improvement process (EI) to improve fab throughput
    Freck, RW
    [J]. 2000 IEEE/SEMI ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP, 2000, : 469 - 471
  • [2] Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and process capability (PC) measures
    Garza-Reyes, Jose
    Eldridge, Steve
    Barber, Kevin
    Soriano-Meier, Horacio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (01) : 48 - +
  • [3] Performance Acceleration on Production Machines Using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Approach
    Mansur, A.
    Rayendra, R.
    Mastur, M. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ICET4SD) 2015, 2016, 105
  • [4] Managing Overall Equipment Effectiveness [OEE] to optimize factory performance
    Pomorski, T
    [J]. 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : A33 - A36
  • [5] OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE) FOR DIAGNOSIS AND PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOUNDRY INDUSTRY
    Dornelles, Jose Vinicius
    Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
    [J]. REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E TECNOLOGIAS, 2015, 5 (03): : 2366 - 2379
  • [6] Effectiveness of compressor machine by using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) method
    Siregar, Khawarita
    Syahputri, Khalida
    Anizar
    Sari, Rahmi M.
    Rizkya, Indah
    Tambunan, Mangara M.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (ICENIS 2018), 2018, 73
  • [7] Consideration of demand rate in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) on equipment with constant process time
    Puvanasvaran, Perumal
    Teoh, Y. S.
    Tay, C. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-JIEM, 2013, 6 (02): : 507 - 524
  • [8] A holistic approach to overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
    Loughlin, S
    [J]. COMPUTING & CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2004, 14 (06): : 37 - 42
  • [9] COST ADJUSTED OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE)
    Diaz-Contreras, Carlos A.
    Catari-Vargas, David A.
    De Jesus Murga-Villanueva, Corazon
    Diaz-Vidal, Gabriela A.
    Quezada-Lara, Vania F.
    [J]. INTERCIENCIA, 2020, 45 (03) : 158 - 163
  • [10] Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and cost measurement
    Konopka, J
    Trybula, W
    [J]. NINETEENTH IEEE/CPMT INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM - PROCEEDINGS, 1996 IEMT SYMPOSIUM, 1996, : 137 - 140