Use of measuring gauges for in vivo accuracy analysis of intraoral scanners: a pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
Iturrate, Mikel [1 ]
Amezua, Xabier [2 ]
Garikano, Xabier [2 ]
Solaberrieta, Eneko [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Fac Engn Gipuzkoa, Dept Business Management, UPV EHU, San Sebastian, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, Fac Engn Gipuzkoa, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, UPV EHU, San Sebastian, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | 2021年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Intraoral scanner  3D optical scanner  Measuring gauge  In vivo accuracy evaluation; Digital impression; CONVENTIONAL IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; DIGITAL METHODS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; ARCH; EFFICIENCY; PRECISION; FIT;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.191
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study is to present a methodology to evaluate the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOS) used in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A specific feature-based gauge was designed, manufactured, and measured in a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), obtaining reference distances and angles. Then, 10 scans were taken by an IOS with the gauge in the patient's mouth and from the obtained stereolithography (STL) files, a total of 40 distances and 150 angles were measured and compared with the gauge's reference values. In order to provide a comparison, there were defined distance and angle groups in accordance with the increasing scanning area: from a short span area to a complete-arch scanning extension. Data was analyzed using software for statistical analysis. RESULTS. Deviations in measured distances showed that accuracy worsened as the scanning area increased: trueness varied from 0.018 +/- 0.021 mm in a distance equivalent to the space spanning a four-unit bridge to 0.106 +/- 0.08 mm in a space equivalent to a complete arch. Precision ranged from 0.015 +/- 0.03 mm to 0.077 +/- 0.073 mm in the same two areas. When analyzing angles, deviations did not show such a worsening pattern. In addition, deviations in angle measurement values were low and there were no calculated significant differences among angle groups. CONCLUSION. Currently, there is no standardized procedure to assess the accuracy of IOS in vivo, and the results show that the proposed methodology can contribute to this purpose. The deviations measured in the study show a worsening accuracy when increasing the length of the scanning area. [J Adv Prosthodont 2021;13:191-204]
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 204
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy, Time, and Comfort of Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vivo Comparison Study
    Lione, Roberta
    De Razza, Francesca Chiara
    Gazzani, Francesca
    Lugli, Letizia
    Cozza, Paola
    Pavoni, Chiara
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (17):
  • [2] Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: an in vivo study
    Federica Pellitteri
    Paolo Albertini
    Angelica Vogrig
    Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato
    Giuseppe Siciliani
    Luca Lombardo
    [J]. Progress in Orthodontics, 23
  • [3] Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: an in vivo study
    Pellitteri, Federica
    Albertini, Paolo
    Vogrig, Angelica
    Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo
    Siciliani, Giuseppe
    Lombardo, Luca
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [4] Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method
    Nedelcu, R.
    Olsson, P.
    Nystrom, I.
    Ryden, J.
    Thor, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 69 : 110 - 118
  • [5] Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: In vivo analysis of trueness and precision
    Kwon, Miran
    Cho, Youngmok
    Kim, Dong-Wook
    Kim, MyungSu
    Kim, Yoon-Ji
    Chang, Minho
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2021, 51 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [6] In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: a narrative review
    Jennes, Marie-Elise
    Soetebeer, Maren
    Beuer, Florian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2022, 25 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [7] A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Lizundia, Erlantz
    Amezua, Xabier
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (06): : 331 - 340
  • [8] In vitro comparative analysis of scanning accuracy of intraoral and laboratory scanners in measuring the distance between multiple implants
    Reiji Natsubori
    Shota Fukazawa
    Toyokazu Chiba
    Norimasa Tanabe
    Hidemichi Kihara
    Hisatomo Kondo
    [J]. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8
  • [9] In vitro comparative analysis of scanning accuracy of intraoral and laboratory scanners in measuring the distance between multiple implants
    Natsubori, Reiji
    Fukazawa, Shota
    Chiba, Toyokazu
    Tanabe, Norimasa
    Kihara, Hidemichi
    Kondo, Hisatomo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [10] Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study
    Alzahrani, Saeed J.
    EL-Hammali, Hind
    Morgano, Steven M.
    Elkassaby, Heba
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (06): : 787 - 792