Deriving phenology of barley with imaging hyperspectral remote sensing

被引:24
|
作者
Lausch, Angela [1 ]
Salbach, Christoph [1 ]
Schmidt, Andreas [1 ]
Doktor, Daniel [1 ]
Merbach, Ines [1 ]
Pause, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Phenological stage; BBCH barley; Hyperspectral sensor; AISA; Spectral indices; Vegetation characteristics; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEXES; WATER-CONTENT; LEAF-AREA; USE EFFICIENCY; STRESS; SOIL; LAI; FLUORESCENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper was to create a model that predicts the different phenological BBCH macro-stages of barley in laboratory on the plot scale and to transfer the most suitable model to the landscape scale. To characterise the phenology, eight vitality and phenology-related vegetation parameters like leaf area index (LAI), Chl-SPAD content, C-content, N-content, C/N-content, canopy chlorophyll content (CCC), gravimetric water content (GWC) and vegetation height at the same time as all imaging hyperspectral measurements (AISA-EAGLE, 395-973 nm). These biochemical-biophysical vegetation parameters were investigated according to the different phenological macro-stages of barley. The predictive models were developed using four different types of vegetation indices (VI): (I) published VI's, (II) reflectance VI's as well as (III) VI(xy) formula combinations and (IV) a combination of all VI index types using the Library for Support Vector Machines (LibSVM) and tested with a recursive conditional correlation weighting selection algorithm (RCCW) to reduce the number of variables. To increase the performance of the model a 10-fold cross-validation was carried out for all statistical models. The GWC was found to be the most important variable for differentiating between the phenological macro-stages of barley. The most suitable model for predicting the phenological BBCH macro-stages was achieved by a model that combined all three kinds of VI's: published VI's, reflectance VI's and formula combination VI's with a classification accuracy of 84.80%. With the classification model for the reflectance VI's Y = 746 nm and for the VI formula combinations Y = (527 + 612) nm and Y = (540 + 639) nm. The best predictive model was applied to the airborne AISA-EAGLE hyperspectral data to model the phenological macro-stages of barley at the landscape level. The classification error of the best predictive model of 12.80% as well as disturbance factors such as channels and areas with weeds or ruderal vegetation lead to misclassifications of BBCH macro-stages at the landscape level. By using One Sensor At Different Scales-Approach (OSADIS), sensor-specific differences in the model building and model transfer can be eliminated. The approach described in the paper for determining the phenology based on imaging hyperspectral RS data shows that in the process of plant phonological development a number of biochemical-biophysical vegetation traits in vegetation change, which can be thoroughly recorded with hyperspectral remote sensing technology. For this reason, hyperspectral RS constitutes an ideal, cost-effective and comparable approach, with whose help vegetation traits and changes can be quantified, which are key for ecological modelling. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WEAKLY SUPERVISED SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION FOR REMOTE SENSING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING
    Moliner, Eloi
    Romero, Luis Salgueiro
    Vilaplana, Veronica
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, : 2273 - 2277
  • [22] Spectral monitoring of moorland plant phenology to identify a temporal window for hyperspectral remote sensing of peatland
    Cole, Beth
    McMorrow, Julia
    Evans, Martin
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 90 : 49 - 58
  • [23] A Short Survey of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Research At TUBITAK UZAY
    Sakarya, Ufuk
    Teke, Mustafa
    Demirkesen, Can
    Haliloglu, Onur
    Kozal, Ali Omer
    Deveci, Husne Seda
    Oztoprak, A. Feray
    Toreyin, Behcet Ugur
    Gurbuz, Sevgi Zubeyde
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN SPACE TECHNOLOGIES (RAST), 2015, : 187 - 192
  • [24] POTENTIAL OF AN EMBEDDED HYPERSPECTRAL COMPRESSIVE IMAGING SYSTEM FOR REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS
    Lim, Olivier
    Mancini, Stephane
    Mura, Mauro Dalla
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 4238 - 4241
  • [25] The PNNL quantitative IR database for infrared remote sensing and hyperspectral imaging
    Sharpe, SW
    Sams, RL
    Johnson, TJ
    31ST APPLIED IMAGERY PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOP, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 45 - 48
  • [26] Novel interferometric, hyperspectral imaging instruments for remote-sensing applications
    Glumb, Ronald
    Lapsley, Michael
    Mantica, Peter
    MICRO- AND NANOTECHNOLOGY SENSORS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS X, 2018, 10639
  • [27] Hyperspectral remote sensing in China
    Tong, QX
    Zheng, LF
    Xue, YQ
    MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING, 2001, 4548 : 1 - 9
  • [28] Hyperspectral remote sensing Preface
    Navalgund, Ranganath
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2015, 108 (05): : 825 - 825
  • [29] Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation
    Im, Jungho
    Jensen, John R.
    GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (06): : 1943 - 1961
  • [30] Hyperspectral remote sensing of agriculture
    Sahoo, R. N.
    Ray, S. S.
    Manjunath, K. R.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2015, 108 (05): : 848 - 859