Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools

被引:52
|
作者
Wen, Baohua [1 ,2 ]
Musa, Nurmaya [1 ]
Onn, Chiu Chuen [3 ]
Ramesh, S. [1 ,6 ]
Liang, Lihua [4 ]
Wang, Wei [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Ctr Adv Mfg & Mat Proc, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Hebei Univ Engn, Guangming South St 199, Handan 056038, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Malaya, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[4] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[5] Hebei Finance Univ, 3188 Hengxiang North St, Baoding City 071051, Hebei, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Teknol Brunei, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, BE-1410 Gadong, Brunei
关键词
Green building; Rating tools; Sustainability; Development; Trend; Three pillars; SYSTEMS; CONSTRUCTION; TRENDS; LEED; OBSTACLES; IMPACT; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120912
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green building rating tools (GBRTs) are well-known and important instruments for assessing building sustainability. GBRTs constantly upgrade to meet rapid development, one of which is achieving a reasonable balance among the "three pillars" of sustainability, namely, environmental, social and economic sustainability. This study analyzes the changes and trends in the three sustainability pillars of GBRT and reinforces the previous GBRT longitudinal studies in terms of research sample, time span, equal terms, and research depth. Ten global GBRTs are selected by specific screening principles, and a unified criterion framework is presented to compare these selected GBRTs on equal terms. The changes of GBRTs are then analyzed on three levels, namely, categories, subcategories, and criteria. The results show that in the past three decades, there is a continuous decrease in the weight of the environmental category, an obvious increase in the weight of the social category and a little rise in the wight of the "economic" category. "Pollution," "physical comfort," and "flexibility" are identified as "sensitive criteria" of environmental, social, and economic categories, respectively, given their significant changes; they are also critical factors for the evolution of GBRT for the past three decades. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools
    Illankoon, I. M. Chethana S.
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Le, Khoa N.
    Shen, Liyin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 209 - 220
  • [12] Environmental, Economic, and Social Parameters in International Green Building Rating Tools
    Illankoon, I. M. Chethana S.
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Le, Khoa N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2017, 143 (02)
  • [13] A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools
    Chen, Xi
    Yang, Hongxing
    Lu, Lin
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 1425 - 1436
  • [14] Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing
    Xue, Fei
    Lau, Stephen SiuYu
    Gou, Zhonghua
    Song, Yifan
    Jiang, Boya
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2019, 76 : 98 - 112
  • [15] Analyzing green building rating tools for healthcare buildings from the building user's perspective
    Kim, Sumin
    Osmond, Paul
    [J]. INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (05) : 757 - 766
  • [16] Insights on Green Building Rating Systems for Housing in India and Their Assessment with Pillars of Sustainability
    Piparsania, Kratika
    Kalita, Pratul
    [J]. WITH DESIGN: REINVENTING DESIGN MODES, IASDR 2021, 2022, : 2464 - 2484
  • [17] Incorporating biophilic criteria into green building rating tools: Case study of Green Mark and LEED
    Jiang, Boya
    Song, Yifan
    Li, Hong Xian
    Lau, Stephen Siu-Yu
    Lei, Qinghua
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 82
  • [18] A review on green building assessment tools: rating, calculation and decision-making
    Chehrzad, M.
    Pooshideh, S. M.
    Hosseini, A.
    Sardroud, J. Majrouhi
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITY XI, 2016, 204 : 397 - 404
  • [19] A comparative analysis of site planning and design among green building rating tools
    Huo, Xiaosen
    Yu, Ann T. W.
    Wu, Zezhou
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 147 : 352 - 359
  • [20] Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts
    Shan, Ming
    Hwang, Bon-gang
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 39 : 172 - 180