Rejection efficiency of water quality parameters by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes

被引:58
|
作者
Peng, W
Escobar, IC
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Environm Chem & Engn, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Civil Engn, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es034202h
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of reserve osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes, under various solution chemistries, on water quality. The effects of organic carbon, divalent and monovalent cations, bacteria, and permeate drag on the rejection efficiencies of three different membranes were investigated through a series of laboratory bench-scale experiments. Quantitative models were successfully developed to predict the rejection of turbidity, divalent and monovalent cations, ultraviolet absorbance at 253.7 nm (UV254), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) by membrane filtration. It was found that mechanical sieving (measured as molecular weight cutoff, MWCO) and electrostatic interactions were the most significant parameters since they were found to be important in nearly all models developed. For negatively charged membranes, under high ionic strength solution environments that repress electrostatic interaction between charged compounds and membranes, passage of compounds was mainly a function of size exclusion (i.e. MWCO). Further, of the feedwater parameters tested, bacteria concentration was observed to be the most significant influence on UV254, divalent cation and monovalent cation rejections. The developed models revealed that interactions between feedwater composition and membrane properties impacted the rejection efficiency of membranes as significantly as water composition and membrane properties individually.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4435 / 4441
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPACT OF HYDRODYNAMIC CONDITIONS IN THE MEMBRANE PLANT ON THE SEPARATION EFFICIENCY OF REVERSE OSMOSIS AND NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    Drazevic, Emil
    Kosutic, Kresimir
    HRVATSKE VODE, 2013, 21 (85) : 205 - 214
  • [32] A mechanistic study on boron rejection by sea water reverse osmosis membranes
    Hyung, Hoon
    Kim, Jae-Hong
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 286 (1-2) : 269 - 278
  • [33] Prediction of nanofiltration rejection performance in brackish water reverse osmosis brine treatment processes
    Bonner, Ricky
    Germishuizen, Charne
    Franzsen, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2019, 32
  • [34] Degradation of Polyamide Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes by Hypochlorite
    Van Thanh Do
    Tang, Chuyang Y.
    Reinhard, Martin
    Leckie, James O.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 852 - 859
  • [35] Microscopy and Microanalysis of Reverse-Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes
    David G. Cahill
    Viatcheslav Freger
    Seung-Yeop Kwak
    MRS Bulletin, 2008, 33 : 27 - 32
  • [36] Monitoring and control of biofouling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Wetsus, Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology, Agora 1, 8900 CC Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 2008, 4 (449-458): : 449 - 458
  • [37] Zeta potential measurements of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes
    Childress, AE
    Deshmukh, SS
    Elimelech, M
    WATER SUPPLY PUZZLE: HOW DOES DESALTING FIT IN?, 1996, : 700 - 716
  • [38] Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Yang, Linyan
    Xia, Caiping
    Jiang, Jielun
    Chen, Xueming
    Zhou, Yanbo
    Yuan, Cheng
    Bai, Lichun
    Meng, Shujuan
    Cao, Guomin
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2024, 461
  • [39] Microscopy and, microanalysis of reverse-osmosis and nanofiltration membranes
    Cahill, David G.
    Freger, Viatcheslav
    Kwak, Seung-Yeop
    MRS BULLETIN, 2008, 33 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [40] Characterization of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by an automated system
    Kusberg, DJC
    Lebrun, RE
    Kumar, A
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 74 (06): : 896 - 904