Life cycle assessment of nickel products

被引:52
|
作者
Mistry, Mark [1 ]
Gediga, Johannes [2 ]
Boonzaier, Shannon [2 ]
机构
[1] Nickel Inst, Rue Belliard 12, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Thinkstep AG, Hauptstr 111-113, D-70771 Leinfelden Echterdingen, Germany
来源
关键词
Cradle-to-gate; Ferronickel; Global warming potential; LCI; LCIA; Nickel; Primary energy demand;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1085-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To support the data requirements of stakeholders, the Nickel Institute (NI) conducted a global life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to show, with indicators, the potential environmental impacts of the production of nickel and ferronickel from mine to refinery gate. A metal industry wide agreed approach on by-products and allocation was applied. Nine companies, comprising 19 operations, contributed data, representing 52 % of global nickel metal production and 40 % of global ferronickel production. All relevant pyro- and hydrometallurgical production routes were considered, across most major nickel-producing regions. Data from Russia, the biggest nickel-producing nation, was included; the Chinese industry did not participate. 2011 was chosen as reference year for data collection. The LCIA applied allocation of impacts of by-products using both economic and mass allocations. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to further understand the relevance and impact of the different allocation approaches. The primary extraction and refining steps are the main contributors to primary energy demand (PED) and global warming potential (GWP), contributing 60 and 70 % to the PED for the production of 1 kg class I nickel and 1 kg nickel in ferronickel, respectively, and over 55 % of the GWP for both nickel products. The PED for 1 kg class 1 nickel was calculated to be 147 MJ, whilst the PED for 1 kg nickel in ferronickel was calculated to be three times higher at 485 MJ. The main factors influencing energy demand in the metallurgical processes are ore grade and ore mineralogy. Sulphidic ore is less energy intensive to process than oxidic ore. Eighty-six percent of the production volume from class 1 nickel producers, in this study, is from sulphidic ore. All ferronickel was produced from oxidic ore. The LCIA results, including a sensitivity analysis of the impact of producers with higher and lower PED, reflect the influence of the production route on energy demand and on environmental impact categories. Conformant to relevant ISO standards, and backed-up with a technical and critical review, this LCIA quantifies the environmental impacts associated with the production of the main nickel products. With this study, a sound background dataset for downstream users of nickel has been provided. The Nickel Institute aims to update their data in the coming years to reflect upon changes in technology, energy efficiency, and raw material input.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1572
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of nickel products
    Mark Mistry
    Johannes Gediga
    Shannon Boonzaier
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1559 - 1572
  • [2] Life cycle assessment "Life cycle net hemp products"
    Patyk, A
    Reinhardt, GA
    [J]. BIOMASS FOR ENERGY AND INDUSTRY, 1998, : 101 - 104
  • [3] Life cycle Sustainability assessment of products
    Kloepffer, Walter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of copper and nickel production
    Norgate, TE
    Rankin, WJ
    [J]. MINPREX 2000: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY, 2000, 2000 (05): : 133 - 138
  • [5] Menstrual products: A comparable Life Cycle Assessment
    Fourcassier, Sarah
    Douziech, Melanie
    Perez-Lopez, Paula
    Schiebinger, Londa
    [J]. CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 7
  • [6] The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Dairy Products
    Uctug, Fehmi Gorkem
    [J]. FOOD ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2019, 11 (02) : 104 - 121
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of Cocoa Products in Vietnam
    Khang, Dinh Sy
    Linh, Ngo Huu Khanh
    Hoai, Bui Thi Mai
    [J]. PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 8 (04) : 1003 - 1016
  • [8] Application of life cycle assessment to forestry products
    Madhu Verma
    Sachin Dubey
    Ritu Bharadwaj
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7 (3) : 187 - 188
  • [9] The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Dairy Products
    Fehmi Görkem Üçtuğ
    [J]. Food Engineering Reviews, 2019, 11 : 104 - 121
  • [10] Environmental Assessment of Products over the Complete Life Cycle
    Gorbachev S.I.
    Sorokin A.E.
    Bulychev S.N.
    [J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2021, 41 (08) : 772 - 774