Restoration of plant-animal interactions in terrestrial ecosystems

被引:28
|
作者
Genes, Luisa [1 ]
Dirzo, Rodolfo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Frugivory; Herbivory; Pollination; Seed dispersal; Seed predation; Rewilding; TROPICAL FOREST RESTORATION; PRIMATE SEED DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS; HEDGEROW RESTORATION; PASSIVE RESTORATION; ARTIFICIAL ROOSTS; INSECT HERBIVORES; GIANT TORTOISES; RIPARIAN FOREST; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109393
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem restoration is one of the most promising strategies for conservation in the Anthropocene. Within ecosystems, plant-animal interactions are critical to their functioning, biodiversity and to restoration success. However, there is no systematic assessment of such interactions across restoration efforts. We reviewed 127 articles that examined habitat restoration and trophic rewilding to synthesize knowledge on restoration of four key plant-animal interactions: seed dispersal, herbivory, pollination, and seed predation. We conducted a metaanalysis using a subset of 56 studies, which compared restored systems with degraded or reference systems. We addressed four questions: (i) To what extent are interactions recovered in restored sites compared to degraded and reference sites? (ii) Which management practices enhance interaction restoration? (iii) Which interactions and animal taxa were most frequently studied? and (iv) Is interaction restoration being studied in areas deemed critical for conservation? Seed dispersal was the most studied interaction, followed by herbivory, pollination, and seed predation. Mammals were the most studied group, followed by birds, insects, and reptiles. Importantly, occurrence of seed dispersal and pollination was more frequent in restored than degraded sites. While several studies were conducted in critical conservation sites, some biodiversity hotspots, particularly in Southeast Asia, have been understudied. Future research should focus on understudied interactions (e.g., seed predation) and taxa (e.g., insects and reptiles), so this information can be incorporated into practice. Considering the available studies, we find that both habitat restoration and trophic rewilding are effective in bringing seed dispersal and pollination to a better state than in degraded areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of habitat fragmentation on multiple plant-animal interactions and plant reproduction
    Brudvig, Lars A.
    Damschen, Ellen I.
    Haddad, Nick M.
    Levey, Douglas J.
    Tewksbury, Joshua J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2015, 96 (10) : 2669 - 2678
  • [32] Patch dynamics of various plant-animal interactions in fragmented landscapes
    Xu, Zhichao
    Shen, Yang
    Liao, Jinbao
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2018, 368 : 27 - 32
  • [33] Functional equivalence in plant-animal interactions: ecological and evolutionary consequences
    Zamora, R
    [J]. OIKOS, 2000, 88 (02) : 442 - 447
  • [34] PLANT-ANIMAL INTERFACE
    COLEMAN, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1992, 5 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [35] A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant-animal mutualistic interactions
    Vazquez, Diego P.
    Ramos-Jiliberto, Rodrigo
    Urbani, Pasquinell
    Valdovinos, Fernanda S.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 18 (04) : 385 - 400
  • [36] Fragmented tropical forests lose mutualistic plant-animal interactions
    Marjakangas, Emma-Liina
    Abrego, Nerea
    Grotan, Vidar
    de Lima, Renato A. F.
    Bello, Carolina
    Bovendorp, Ricardo S.
    Culot, Laurence
    Hasui, Erica
    Lima, Fernando
    Muylaert, Renata Lara
    Niebuhr, Bernardo Brandao
    Oliveira, Alexandre A.
    Pereira, Lucas Augusto
    Prado, Paulo I.
    Stevens, Richard D.
    Vancine, Mauricio Humberto
    Ribeiro, Milton Cezar
    Galetti, Mauro
    Ovaskainen, Otso
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2020, 26 (02) : 154 - 168
  • [37] How plant-animal interactions signal new insights in communication
    Schaefer, HM
    Schaefer, V
    Levey, DJ
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2004, 19 (11) : 577 - 584
  • [38] Feed back indirect effects of deer on the plant-animal interactions
    Center of Environmental Risk Study, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan
    不详
    不详
    不详
    [J]. Nihon Ringakkai Shi, 2008, 5 (342-347):
  • [39] Disentangling the drivers of context-dependent plant-animal interactions
    Maron, John L.
    Baer, Kathryn C.
    Angert, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2014, 102 (06) : 1485 - 1496
  • [40] Plant-animal interactions in suburban environments: implications for floral evolution
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    Warren, Paige S.
    Carper, Adrian L.
    Adler, Lynn S.
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 2014, 174 (03) : 803 - 815