Subject-verb agreement in children and adults: Serial or hierarchical processing?

被引:10
|
作者
Negro, I
Chanquoy, L
Fayol, M
Louis-Sidney, M
机构
[1] Univ Antilles Guyane, Fac Lettres & Sci Humaines, F-97275 Schoelcher, France
[2] Univ Nice, Nice, France
[3] Univ Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
attraction errors; developmental perspective; serial or hierarchical account; subject-verb agreement;
D O I
10.1007/s10936-005-3639-0
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Two processes, serial and hierarchical, are generally opposed to account for grammatical encoding in language production. In a developmental perspective, the question addressed here is whether the subject-verb agreement during writing is computed serially, once the words are linearly ordered in the sentence, or hierarchically, as soon as the number features are determined in a hierarchical frame. Adults and children from 3rd to 5th grades were requested to listen to sentences with built-in prepositional phrases or relative clauses and to transcribe them as quickly as possible. A serial hypothesis assumes that subject-verb agreement errors should be equally frequent with both preambles because each has the same length separating the subject head noun and the main verb. Conversely, according to a hierarchical view, errors should be more frequent with a prepositional phrase because the syntactic distance between the subject and the verb is greater than with a relative clause. The results revealed a main effect of the preamble manipulated in 5th graders and adults, but not in 3rd graders. These data were in favor of a hierarchical processing in older writers and a serial one in younger children. However, in 3rd grade, we assumed that the potential serial account was a result of the resource constraint on writing more than of a real serial processing of the agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 258
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Object attraction in subject-verb agreement construction
    Hartsuiker, RJ
    Antón-Méndez, I
    van Zee, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 45 (04) : 546 - 572
  • [22] Subject-verb agreement construction in agrammatic aphasia
    Hartsuiker, RJ
    Kolk, HHJ
    Huinck, WJ
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 65 (01) : 64 - 67
  • [23] Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement
    Hartsuiker, RJ
    Schriefers, HJ
    Bock, K
    Kikstra, GM
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2003, 31 (08) : 1316 - 1326
  • [24] Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement
    Robert J. Hartsuiker
    Herbert J. Schriefers
    Kathryn Bock
    Gerdien M. Kikstra
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31 : 1316 - 1326
  • [25] Emotional Attractors in Subject-Verb Number Agreement
    Hatzidaki, Anna
    Santesteban, Mikel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [26] Sensitivity to subject-verb agreement in spoken language in children with developmental dyslexia
    Rispens, J
    Roeleven, S
    Koster, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2004, 17 (05) : 333 - 347
  • [27] The evolution of subject-verb agreement in Eastern Tukanoan
    Chacon, Thiago Costa
    Michael, Lev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS, 2018, 8 (01) : 59 - 94
  • [28] Interference in quantifier float and subject-verb agreement
    Fujita, Hiroki
    Cunnings, Ian
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 38 (07) : 1001 - 1019
  • [29] Processing, Evaluation, Knowledge Testing the Perception of English Subject-Verb Agreement Variation
    Squires, Lauren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LINGUISTICS, 2014, 42 (02) : 144 - 172
  • [30] Online processing of subject-verb agreement in English by first and second language speakers
    Wen, Zhijun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 668 - 679