Analysis of unusual and signature APOBEC-mutations in HIV-1 pol next-generation sequences

被引:31
|
作者
Tzou, Philip L. [1 ]
Pond, Sergei L. Kosakovsky [2 ]
Avila-Rios, Santiago [3 ]
Holmes, Susan P. [4 ]
Kantor, Rami [5 ]
Shafer, Robert W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Inst Genom & Evolutionary Med, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Natl Inst Resp Dis, Ctr Res Infect Dis, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1; RESISTANCE; PROTEASE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225352
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction At low mutation-detection thresholds, next generation sequencing (NGS) for HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing is susceptible to artifactual detection of mutations arising from PCR error and APOBEC-mediated G- to-A hypermutation. Methods We analyzed published HIV-1 pol Illumina NGS data to characterize the distribution of mutations at eight NGS mutation detection thresholds: 20%, 10%, 5%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.1%. At each threshold, we determined proportions of amino acid mutations that were unusual (defined as having a prevalence < 0.01% in HIV-1 group M sequences) or signature APOBEC mutations. Results Eight studies, containing 855 samples, in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive were analyzed. As detection thresholds were lowered, there was a progressive increase in the proportion of positions with usual and unusual mutations and in the proportion of all mutations that were unusual. The median proportion of positions with an unusual mutation increased gradually from 0% at the 20% threshold to 0.3% at the 1% threshold and then exponentially to 1.3% (0.5% threshold), 6.9% (0.2% threshold), and 23.2% (0.1% threshold). In two of three studies with available plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, the proportion of positions with unusual mutations was negatively associated with virus levels. Although the complete set of signature APOBEC mutations was much smaller than that of unusual mutations, the former outnumbered the latter in one-sixth of samples at the 0.5%, 1%, and 2% thresholds. Conclusions The marked increase in the proportion of positions with unusual mutations at thresholds below 1% and in samples with lower virus loads suggests that, at low thresholds, many unusual mutations are artifactual, reflecting PCR error or G-to-A hypermutation. Profiling the numbers of unusual and signature APOBEC pol mutations at different NGS mutation detection thresholds may be useful to avoid selecting a threshold that is too low and poses an unacceptable risk of identifying artifactual mutations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance comparison of next-generation sequencing platforms for determining HIV-1 coreceptor use
    Stéphanie Raymond
    Florence Nicot
    Nicolas Jeanne
    Olivier Delfour
    Romain Carcenac
    Caroline Lefebvre
    Michelle Cazabat
    Karine Sauné
    Pierre Delobel
    Jacques Izopet
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [22] Mapping Polyclonal HIV-1 Antibody Responses via Next-Generation Neutralization Fingerprinting
    Doria-Rose, Nicole A.
    Altae-Tran, Han R.
    Roark, Ryan S.
    Schmidt, Stephen D.
    Sutton, Matthew S.
    Louder, Mark K.
    Chuang, Gwo-Yu
    Bailer, Robert T.
    Cortez, Valerie
    Kong, Rui
    McKee, Krisha
    O'Dell, Sijy
    Wang, Felicia
    Karim, Salim S. Abdool
    Binley, James M.
    Connors, Mark
    Haynes, Barton F.
    Martin, Malcolm A.
    Montefiori, David C.
    Morris, Lynn
    Overbaugh, Julie
    Kwong, Peter D.
    Mascola, John R.
    Georgiev, Ivelin S.
    PLOS PATHOGENS, 2017, 13 (01)
  • [23] Towards Next-Generation Sequencing for HIV-1 Drug Resistance Testing in a Clinical Setting
    Teo, Calesta Hui Yi
    Norhisham, Nurul Hannah Binte
    Lee, Ogestelli Fabia
    Png, Siyu
    Chai, Chean Nee
    Yan, Gabriel
    Tang, Julian Wei-Tze
    Lee, Chun Kiat
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2022, 14 (10):
  • [24] Performance comparison of next-generation sequencing platforms for determining HIV-1 coreceptor use
    Raymond, Stephanie
    Nicot, Florence
    Jeanne, Nicolas
    Delfour, Olivier
    Carcenac, Romain
    Lefebvre, Caroline
    Cazabat, Michelle
    Saune, Karine
    Delobel, Pierre
    Izopet, Jacques
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [25] Use of Four Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms to Determine HIV-1 Coreceptor Tropism
    Archer, John
    Weber, Jan
    Henry, Kenneth
    Winner, Dane
    Gibson, Richard
    Lee, Lawrence
    Paxinos, Ellen
    Arts, Eric J.
    Robertson, David L.
    Mimms, Larry
    Quinones-Mateu, Miguel E.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [26] HIV-1 next-generation sequencing: from pipe-dream to diagnostic pipeline
    Scott, P.
    Fetherston, R.
    Holden, J.
    Hand, D.
    Phillips, E.
    Davies, S.
    Brett, A.
    Atkins, M.
    Fink, C.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2020, 21 : 31 - 31
  • [27] Genetic analyses of HIV-1 pol sequences from Zimbabwean patients
    Falasca, Francesca
    Temperoni, Chiara
    Mazzuti, Laura
    Lo Presti, Alessandra
    Ciccozzi, Massimo
    Di Filippo, Elisa
    Iaiani, Giancarlo
    Taliani, Gloria
    Turriziani, Ombretta
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2014, 37 (03): : 377 - 381
  • [28] Next generation DNA vaccines for HIV-1
    Boyer, JD
    Chattergoon, M
    Muthumani, K
    Kudchodkar, S
    Kim, J
    Bagarazzi, M
    Pavlakis, G
    Sekaly, R
    Weiner, DB
    JOURNAL OF LIPOSOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (1-2) : 137 - 142
  • [29] Frequency of additional resistance relevant mutations in 2% and 1% population proportions in next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine HIV-1 resistance diagnostics
    Ehret, Robert
    Moritz, Andrew
    Schuetze, Marcel
    Obermeier, Martin
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2016, 19
  • [30] Assessment of HIV-1 subtyping for Cameroon strains using phylogenetic analysis of pol gene sequences
    Njouom, R
    Pasquier, C
    Sandres-Sauné, K
    Harter, A
    Souyris, C
    Izopet, J
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 110 (01) : 1 - 8