Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using hydromorphone and metamizole (dipyrone). A prospective, randomised study

被引:0
|
作者
Lehmann, KA [1 ]
Paral, F [1 ]
Sabatowski, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Klin Anaesthesiol & Operat Intens Med, D-50924 Cologne, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2001年 / 50卷 / 10期
关键词
postoperative pain; patient-controlled analgesia; hydromorphone; metamizole;
D O I
10.1007/s001010100206
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Most potent opioid analgesics available in Germany have been investigated for use in postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). To conclude an older comparative series, it was the aim of the present study to define analgesic potency, side effects and patient acceptance of hydromorphone and its interaction with the non-opioid analgesic metamizole. A total of 120 patients recovering from elective abdominal or orthopaedic surgery, performed under standardised general anaesthesia, were randomised into 3 double-blind treatment groups to receive intravenous PCA demand doses of hydromorphone 283 mug (low dose, LD), 566 mug (high dose, HD) or a combination of hydromorphone 283 mug and metamizole 50 mg (low dose hydromorphone + metamizole, LM). Demand-independent low-dose background infusions were added to deliver hydromorphone at 67.9 mug/h in all groups, with additional metamizole at 12 mg/h in group LM. Lockout times were set to 2 min. After an average observation time of 24.5 +/-2.6 h (mean, SD) since start of PCA, cumulative PCA hydromorphone doses in groups LD, HD and LM were 7.8 +/-3.3, 12.1 +/-4.8 and 7.5 +/-2.0 mg, respectively, with the well known large inter-individual variability in all groups. Although hydromorphone consumption was significantly higher in group HD, self-reported pain intensities (VAS, retrospective pain scores) were quite comparable between the groups. Low dose, PCA bolus-linked metamizole did not significantly reduce hydromorphone consumption nor improve patient acceptance. Side-effects were typical for potent postoperative opioids, but never required special treatment; haemodynamic or respiratory complications were not observed in any patient. It can be concluded by comparison with other PCA opioid investigations performed under the same study protocol that hydromorphone is about 3-4 times as potent an analgesic as morphine under the conditions of intravenous postoperative PCA. Due to a favourable patient acceptance, hydromorphone can be recommended as a suitable alternative to other opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 756
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Ebell, Mark H.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 76 (11) : 1645 - 1645
  • [42] The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS) - An alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative setting
    Sinatra, R
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2005, 44 : 1 - 6
  • [43] Hydromorphone vs sufentanil in patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management A meta-analysis
    Nie, Zhong-Biao
    Li, Zhi-Hong
    Lu, Bin
    Guo, Yao-Yao
    Zhang, Ran
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (03) : E28615
  • [44] Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids -: A meta-analysis
    Wu, CL
    Cohen, SR
    Richman, JM
    Rowlingson, AJ
    Courpas, GE
    Cheung, K
    Lin, EE
    Liu, SS
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (05) : 1079 - 1088
  • [45] Patient-controlled analgesia in the pediatric population: morphine versus hydromorphone
    DiGiusto, Matthew
    Bhalla, Tarun
    Martin, David
    Foerschler, Derek
    Jones, Megan J.
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 7 : 471 - 475
  • [46] Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Interactions between nalbuphine and hydromorphone
    Parker, RK
    Holtmann, B
    White, PF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04): : 757 - 763
  • [47] Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Hwang, Boo Young
    Kwon, Jae Young
    Jeon, So Eun
    Kim, Eun Soo
    Kim, Hyae Jin
    Lee, Hyeon Jeong
    An, Jihye
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 31 (03): : 191 - 198
  • [48] A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery
    Ferguson, Sarah E.
    Malhotra, Tim
    Seshan, Venkatraman E.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [49] Postoperative nausea and vomiting in children using patient-controlled analgesia: the effect of prophylactic intravenous dixyrazine
    Kokinsky, E
    Thornberg, E
    Nilsson, K
    Larsson, LE
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (02) : 191 - 195
  • [50] Clinical study on the effect of remifentanil patient-controlled intravenous labor analgesia compared to patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia
    Li, Haibing
    Li, Hui
    Yu, Yibing
    Lu, Yan
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 94 (07) : 544 - 551