Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: connecting conservation and farming actors

被引:33
|
作者
Zinngrebe, Yves [1 ,11 ]
Borasino, Elena [2 ]
Chiputwa, Brian [3 ]
Dobie, Philip [3 ]
Garcia, Edwin [4 ]
Gassner, Anja [5 ]
Kihumuro, Phillip [6 ]
Komarudin, Heru [7 ]
Liswanti, Nining [7 ]
Makui, Permutia [3 ]
Plieninger, Tobias [1 ,8 ]
Winter, Etti [9 ]
Hauck, Jennifer [10 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Grp Anal Desarrollo GRADE, Lima, Peru
[3] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Ctr Agron Trop Invest & Ensenanza CATIE, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
[5] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Los Banos, Philippines
[6] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Kampala, Uganda
[7] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
[8] Univ Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany
[9] Leibnitz Univ Hannover, Hannover, Germany
[10] CoKnow Consulting, Jesewitz, Germany
[11] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Social capital; Adaptive capacity; Biodiversity; Aichi target 7; Social network analysis; Net-Map; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY INTEGRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE; SYSTEMS; FOREST; AGRICULTURE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion and intensification of agriculture as well as the associated land clearing are threatening both biodiversity and human wellbeing in tropical areas. Implementing agroforestry systems through a landscape approach has a strong potential for integrating nature conservation objectives into agricultural systems. A key challenge for implementing the landscape approach is that political processes and conservation initiatives operate in 'silos', being largely disconnected from farmers and local key agents responsible for tree governance. In this study we brought together different stakeholders in facilitated, structured focus discussions to analyse the role of actor groups in tree governance. We used social network analysis to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse agroforestry governance networks and actor interactions related to information exchange, finance flows, and regulation. The analyses were conducted at national, sub-national and local levels in four countries: Honduras, Peru, Indonesia, and Uganda. Using trees on farms as a boundary object enabled all participants to bridge common interests and illuminate some of the constraints and opportunities of local governance systems while overcoming institutional and ideological barriers. The quantitative results of the social network analysis identify a strong density of actor linkages. Despite this density, results indicate incoherent and fragmented actor networks undermining the support for agroforestry on all levels. Nevertheless, existing processes related to finance, information, and regulation can be better aligned to ensure an effective implementation and mainstreaming of agroforestry for biodiversity conservation. Building social capital among key actors on both national and local levels can reveal a strong potential for adaptive learning processes mainstreaming agroforestry as essential component of "good farming" and integrating incentive systems for a coherent and effective agroforestry governance. We conclude that redirecting both public and private funding towards continuous seed-funding for the facilitation of these integrated learning processes can transform landscape management and at the same time reduce transaction costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1417 / 1434
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empowering landscape ecology-connecting science to governance through design values
    Swaffield, Simon
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 1193 - 1201
  • [22] Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities: adaptive governance and connectivity conservation
    Wyborn, Carina A.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [23] Local actors, farmer decisions and landscape crop diversity in smallholder farming systems: A systems perspective
    Kpienbaareh, Daniel
    Mohammed, Kamaldeen
    Luginaah, Isaac
    Wang, Jinfei
    Kerr, Rachel Bezner
    Lupafya, Esther
    Dakishoni, Laifolo
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 374
  • [24] Systems, habitats or places: evaluating the potential role of landscape character assessment in operationalising the ecosystem approach
    Morrison, Rachel
    Barker, Adam
    Handley, John
    LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2018, 43 (07) : 1000 - 1012
  • [25] Conservation of butterfly populations in dynamic landscapes: The role of farming practices and landscape mosaic
    Aviron, Stephanie
    Kindlmann, Pavel
    Burel, Francoise
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 205 (1-2) : 135 - 145
  • [26] Network theory an evolving approach to landscape conservation
    Keitt, TH
    ECOLOGICAL MODELING FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2003, : 125 - 134
  • [27] Conservation of Tree Species Richness in a Traditional Agroforestry Landscape in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, South Africa
    Makhubele, Lucky
    Chirwa, Paxie W.
    Sheppard, Jonathan P.
    Tshidzumba, Ratsodo P.
    Araia, Mulugheta G.
    Kahle, Hans-Peter
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (11):
  • [28] A systems approach to improving the quality of tree seedlings for agroforestry, tree farming and reforestation in the Philippines
    Gregorio, Nestor
    Herbohn, John
    Harrison, Steve
    Smith, Carl
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 47 : 29 - 41
  • [29] Estimating landscape intensity through farming practices: An integrative and flexible approach to modelling farming intensity from field to landscape.
    Maudet, Simon
    Brusse, Théo
    Poss, Benoit
    Caro, Gaël
    Marrec, Ronan
    Ecological Modelling, 2025, 501
  • [30] Forest Landscape Restoration: Who Decides? A Governance Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration
    van Oosten, Cora
    NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2013, 11 (02): : 119 - 126