Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: connecting conservation and farming actors

被引:33
|
作者
Zinngrebe, Yves [1 ,11 ]
Borasino, Elena [2 ]
Chiputwa, Brian [3 ]
Dobie, Philip [3 ]
Garcia, Edwin [4 ]
Gassner, Anja [5 ]
Kihumuro, Phillip [6 ]
Komarudin, Heru [7 ]
Liswanti, Nining [7 ]
Makui, Permutia [3 ]
Plieninger, Tobias [1 ,8 ]
Winter, Etti [9 ]
Hauck, Jennifer [10 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Grp Anal Desarrollo GRADE, Lima, Peru
[3] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] Ctr Agron Trop Invest & Ensenanza CATIE, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
[5] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Los Banos, Philippines
[6] World Agroforestry ICRAF, Kampala, Uganda
[7] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
[8] Univ Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany
[9] Leibnitz Univ Hannover, Hannover, Germany
[10] CoKnow Consulting, Jesewitz, Germany
[11] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Social capital; Adaptive capacity; Biodiversity; Aichi target 7; Social network analysis; Net-Map; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY INTEGRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE; SYSTEMS; FOREST; AGRICULTURE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion and intensification of agriculture as well as the associated land clearing are threatening both biodiversity and human wellbeing in tropical areas. Implementing agroforestry systems through a landscape approach has a strong potential for integrating nature conservation objectives into agricultural systems. A key challenge for implementing the landscape approach is that political processes and conservation initiatives operate in 'silos', being largely disconnected from farmers and local key agents responsible for tree governance. In this study we brought together different stakeholders in facilitated, structured focus discussions to analyse the role of actor groups in tree governance. We used social network analysis to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse agroforestry governance networks and actor interactions related to information exchange, finance flows, and regulation. The analyses were conducted at national, sub-national and local levels in four countries: Honduras, Peru, Indonesia, and Uganda. Using trees on farms as a boundary object enabled all participants to bridge common interests and illuminate some of the constraints and opportunities of local governance systems while overcoming institutional and ideological barriers. The quantitative results of the social network analysis identify a strong density of actor linkages. Despite this density, results indicate incoherent and fragmented actor networks undermining the support for agroforestry on all levels. Nevertheless, existing processes related to finance, information, and regulation can be better aligned to ensure an effective implementation and mainstreaming of agroforestry for biodiversity conservation. Building social capital among key actors on both national and local levels can reveal a strong potential for adaptive learning processes mainstreaming agroforestry as essential component of "good farming" and integrating incentive systems for a coherent and effective agroforestry governance. We conclude that redirecting both public and private funding towards continuous seed-funding for the facilitation of these integrated learning processes can transform landscape management and at the same time reduce transaction costs.
引用
收藏
页码:1417 / 1434
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: connecting conservation and farming actors
    Yves Zinngrebe
    Elena Borasino
    Brian Chiputwa
    Philip Dobie
    Edwin Garcia
    Anja Gassner
    Phillip Kihumuro
    Heru Komarudin
    Nining Liswanti
    Permutia Makui
    Tobias Plieninger
    Etti Winter
    Jennifer Hauck
    Sustainability Science, 2020, 15 : 1417 - 1434
  • [2] Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation
    Scarlett, Lynn
    McKinney, Matthew
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (03) : 116 - 125
  • [3] Operationalising local level governance for nutrition based on the system approach
    Twinomugisha, Miria
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2015, 67 : 474 - 474
  • [4] Conservation agreements and environmental governance: The role of nongovernmental actors
    Boonrueang, Surasak
    Reid, Colin
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2021, 30 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [5] Challenges and opportunities of a landscape governance approach to the REDD plus programme: a conservation outlook
    Mbatu, Richard
    ORYX, 2019, 53 (01) : 130 - 135
  • [6] 'Smart farming' in Ireland: A risk perception study with key governance actors
    Regan, Aine
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2019, 90-91
  • [7] Geodiversity meets Biodiversity: a landscape approach for biogeocultural conservation and governance in Mediterranean central Chile
    Manriquez, Hermann
    Mansilla, Pablo
    Figueroa-Sterquel, Rodrigo
    Moreira-Munoz, Andres
    ECO MONT-JOURNAL ON PROTECTED MOUNTAIN AREAS RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (01): : 43 - 48
  • [8] Connecting Communities, Connecting Environments: The Role of Social Capital in Landscape-Scale Conservation
    Allen, Karen E.
    McLean, Sarah
    Pessagno, Sophia
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2022, 35 (07) : 763 - 783
  • [9] A study of agroforestry farming for tropical peatland conservation and rehabilitation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Jaya, Adi
    Elia, Andrie
    Antang, Emmy U.
    Octora, Merrisa
    Ichriani, Gusti I.
    Dohong, Salampak
    Sulistiyanto, Yustinus
    MIRES AND PEAT, 2022, 28
  • [10] Agroforestry landscapes and global change: landscape ecology tools for management and conservation
    Martinez Pastur, Guillermo
    Andrieu, Emilie
    Iverson, Louis R.
    Luis Peri, Pablo
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2012, 85 (03) : 315 - 318