Effects of random subject rotation on optimised diffusion gradient sampling schemes in diffusion tensor MRI

被引:2
|
作者
Maniega, Susana Munoz [1 ]
Bastin, Mark E. [1 ]
Armitage, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion tensor; diffusion sampling schemes; Monte Carlo simulations; motion artefacts;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The choice of the number (N) and orientation of diffusion sampling gradients required to measure accurately the water diffusion tensor remains contentious. Monte Carlo studies have suggested that between 20 and 30 uniformly distributed sampling orientations are required to provide robust estimates of water diffusions parameters. These simulations have not, however, taken into account what effect random subject motion, specifically rotation, might have on optimised gradient schemes, a problem which is especially relevant to clinical diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI). Here this question is investigated using Monte Carlo simulations of icosahedral sampling schemes and in vivo data. These polyhedra-based schemes, which have the advantage that large N can be created from optimised subsets of smaller N, appear to be ideal for the study of restless subjects since if scanning needs to be prematurely terminated it should be possible to identify a subset of images that have been acquired with a near optimised sampling scheme. The simulations and in vivo data show that as N increases, the rotational variance of fractional anisotropy (FA) estimates becomes progressively less dependent on the magnitude of subject rotation (a), while higher FA values are progressively underestimated as a increases. These data indicate that for large subject rotations the B-matrix should be recalculated to provide accurate diffusion anisotropy information. 0 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis tool for diffusion tensor MRI
    Fillard, P
    Gerig, G
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2003, PT 2, 2003, 2879 : 967 - 968
  • [32] Diffusion tensor MRI of the spinal cord
    Ries, M
    Jones, RA
    Dousset, V
    Moonen, CTW
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2000, 44 (06) : 884 - 892
  • [33] Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI
    Skare, S
    Hedehus, M
    Moseley, ME
    Li, TQ
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2000, 147 (02) : 340 - 352
  • [34] Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: Part II. Anisotropy, diffusion-weighting factors, and gradient encoding schemes
    Kingsley, PB
    CONCEPTS IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE PART A, 2006, 28A (02) : 123 - 154
  • [35] A diffusion gradient optimization framework for spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging
    Majumdar, Shantanu
    Zhu, David C.
    Udpa, Satish S.
    Raguin, L. Guy
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (06) : 789 - 804
  • [37] Diffusion tensor imaging with multiple diffusion-weighted gradient directions
    Jiang, Shan
    Liu, Meixia
    Han, Tong
    Liu, Weihua
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [38] An Optimised Diffusion MRI Technique to Study Neuron Microstructure
    Arezza, N.
    Tse, D.
    Baron, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E514 - E514
  • [39] Sufficiency of diffusion tensor in characterizing the diffusion MRI signal to leading order in diffusion weighting
    Jensen, Jens H.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 27 (08) : 1005 - 1007
  • [40] Diffusion tensor imaging in anisotropic tissues: application of reduced gradient vector schemes in peripheral nerves
    Olivia Foesleitner
    Alba Sulaj
    Volker Sturm
    Moritz Kronlage
    Fabian Preisner
    Zoltan Kender
    Martin Bendszus
    Julia Szendroedi
    Sabine Heiland
    Daniel Schwarz
    European Radiology Experimental, 8