Margin of error for a frameless image guided radiosurgery system: Direct confirmation based on posttreatment MRI scans

被引:11
|
作者
Luo, Guozhen [1 ,3 ]
Neimat, Joseph S. [2 ]
Cmelak, Anthony [1 ]
Kirschner, Austin N. [1 ]
Attia, Albert [1 ]
Morales-Paliza, Manuel [1 ]
Ding, George X. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Med, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Coll Art & Sci, Dept Phys & Astron, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
LINEAR-ACCELERATOR; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA; RADIATION SURGERY; GAMMA-KNIFE; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; ACCURACY; THALAMOTOMY; LOCALIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2016.08.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report on radiosurgery delivery positioning accuracy in the treatment of tremor patients with frameless image guided radiosurgery using the linear accelerator (LINAC) based ExacTrac system and to describe quality assurance (QA) procedures used. Methods and materials: Between 2010 and 2015, 20 patients underwent radiosurgical thalamotomy targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus for the treatment of severe tremor. The median prescription dose was 140 Gy (range, 120-145 Gy) in a single fraction. The median maximum dose was 156 Gy (range, 136-162 Gy). All treatment planning was performed with the iPlan system using a 4-mm circular cone with multiple arcs. Before each treatment, QA procedures were performed, including the imaging system. As a result of the extremely high dose delivered in a single fraction, a well-defined circular mark developed on the posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eight of these 20 patients were selected to evaluate treatment localization errors because their circular marks were available in posttreatment MRI. In this study, the localization error is defined as the distance between the center of the intended target and the center of the posttreatment mark. Results: The mean error of distance was found to be 1.1 mm(range, 0.4-1.5 mm). The mean errors for the left-right, anteroposterior, and superoinferior directions are 0.5 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.7 mm, respectively. Conclusions: The result reported in this study includes all tremor patients treated at our institution when their posttreatment MRI data were available for study. It represents a direct confirmation of target positioning accuracy in radiosurgery with a LINAC-based frameless system and its limitations. This level of accuracy is only achievable with an appropriate QA program in place for a LINAC-based frameless radiosurgery system. (C) 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E223 / E231
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Margin of Error for a Frameless Image Guided Radiosurgery System: Direct Confirmation Based on Posttreatment MRI Scans
    Luo, G.
    Neimat, J. S.
    Cmelak, A. J.
    Kirschner, A. N.
    Attia, A.
    Morales-Paliza, M.
    Ding, G. X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : S84 - S84
  • [2] The accuracy of dose localization for an image-guided frameless radiosurgery system
    Murphy, MJ
    Cox, RS
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) : 2043 - 2049
  • [3] Targeting accuracy at couch kick for a frameless image guided radiosurgery system
    Huang, Yimei
    Zhao, Bo
    Kim, Joshua
    Wen, Ning
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Siddiqui, Salim
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2018, 5 (02): : 123 - 129
  • [4] Evaluation of the novalis exactrac system for frameless image-guided radiosurgery in the head
    Lamba, M. A. S.
    Plotkin, O.
    Weik, J.
    Breneman, J.
    Warnick, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S244 - S244
  • [5] Testing and initial clinical experience with an image-guided system for frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
    Meeks, SL
    Ryken, TC
    Pennington, EC
    Bova, FJ
    Friedman, WA
    Buatti, JM
    RADIOSURGERY, VOL 4, 2002, 4 : 251 - 261
  • [6] Technical Note: Evaluation of the systematic accuracy of a frameless, multiple image modality guided, linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery system
    Wen, N.
    Snyder, K. C.
    Scheib, S. G.
    Schmelzer, P.
    Qin, Y.
    Li, H.
    Siddiqui, M. S.
    Chetty, I. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (05) : 2527 - 2537
  • [7] DVH metrics, serial MR imaging & outcomes in biologically based frameless image guided trigeminal radiosurgery
    Shankar, V.
    Gupta, A. R.
    Vinoth, K.
    Sathish, P.
    Rajesh, R.
    Ranjan, K.
    Jijo, J.
    Haritha, C.
    Sachin, A.
    Das, S.
    Jain, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 54 : S59 - S59
  • [8] Estimation of Clinical Error With Respiratory Motion Tracking of the Image Guided Robotic Radiosurgery System
    Inoue, M.
    Shiomi, H.
    Iwata, H.
    Koike, I.
    Okawa, K.
    Senda, M.
    Inada, K.
    Tatewaki, K.
    Yokota, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S731 - S732
  • [9] A clinical comparison of patient setup and intra-fraction motion using frame-based radiosurgery versus a frameless image-guided radiosurgery system for intracranial lesions
    Ramakrishna, Naren
    Rosca, Florin
    Friesen, Scott
    Tezcanli, Evrim
    Zygmanszki, Piotr
    Hacker, Fred
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 95 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [10] Geometric Accuracy of Frameless Based Image Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Trigeminal Neuralgia using Brainlab's Exactrac 6-D Robotic System
    Rahimian, J.
    Girvigian, M. R.
    Chen, J. C. T.
    Rahimian, R.
    Miller, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S676 - S676