Assessing the circularity performance in a European cross-country comparison

被引:31
|
作者
Colasante, Annarita [1 ]
D'Adamo, Idiano [2 ]
Morone, Piergiuseppe [1 ]
Rosa, Paolo [3 ]
机构
[1] Unitelma Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Law & Econ, Viale Regina Elena 295, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Via Ariosto 25, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Piazza L Da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Circular economy; Waste from electrical and electronic equipment; End-of-life vehicles; Municipal solid waste; Analytic hierarchy process; WASTE MANAGEMENT; ECONOMY; RECYCLABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM; CHINA; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106730
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reuse and recycling are two of the most important strategies involved in the practical implementation of the circular economy (CE). Even if several indices have been defined to quantify the performance of waste management, none of them has integrated a mix of waste streams such as waste from electrical and electronic equipment, end-of-life vehicles, and municipal solid waste. The present paper proposes a new Waste Circularity Index (WCI) generated by a weighted average, with weights established through pairwise comparison using the analytic hierarchy process methodology. Nine indices (three for each waste stream) are combined, and three measurement logics are adopted. Results show that the 28 European Member States (MSs) can be clustered into six groups, with a reference to the European average. Denmark emerges as the best performer within the 2014-2018 timeframe. In addition, there are also contradicting results about certain waste streams in western MSs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring patent quality in cross-country comparison
    Boeing, Philipp
    Mueller, Elisabeth
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 149 : 145 - 147
  • [42] Income and Consumption of Retirees: A Cross-Country Comparison
    Ryzhkova, Marina
    Chikov, Mikhail
    Kashapova, Elmira
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, SOCIAL SPHERE AND MEDICINE (ITSMSSM), 2016, 51 : 464 - 470
  • [43] The Use of Cheques in the European Union: A Cross-Country Analysis
    Vânia G. Silva
    Esmeralda A. Ramalho
    Carlos R. Vieira
    [J]. Open Economies Review, 2017, 28 : 581 - 602
  • [44] Actual Retirement Age: A European Cross-Country Analysis
    Axelrad, Hila
    Luski, Israel
    [J]. AGEING INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 47 (03) : 534 - 558
  • [45] Cross-country comparison of the efficiency of the European forest sector and second stage DEA approach
    Ester Gutiérrez
    Sebastián Lozano
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2022, 314 : 471 - 496
  • [46] Values and Support for Immigration: A Cross-Country Comparison
    Davidov, Eldad
    Meuleman, Bart
    Billiet, Jaak
    Schmidt, Peter
    [J]. EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2008, 24 (05) : 583 - 599
  • [47] Sticky educational expectations: A cross-country comparison
    Bernardi, Fabrizio
    Valdes, Manuel T.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2021, 75
  • [48] Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison
    Bjornskov, Christian
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2007, 130 (1-2) : 1 - 21
  • [49] Tax reforms and investment: A cross-country comparison
    Cummins, JG
    Hassett, KA
    Hubbard, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1996, 62 (1-2) : 237 - 273
  • [50] Urban ground leases: a cross-country comparison
    Pope, Alan R.
    Young, Martin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPERTY RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (02) : 126 - 146